Preview

Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management

Advanced search

Global Risks as a Trigger of Phenomenological Risks

https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2022-12-6-183-197

Abstract

   Relevance. The digitalization of society generates a wide range of risks, the traditional social order is being destroyed. In conditions of belittling the value of the value-normative system of the individual, a situation of uncertainty appears that forms a risk society. There is a catalyzation of risks, expanding their range from geopolitical to social.
   The purpose is to reveal the influence of global risks of modern society on the formation of phenomenological risks.
   Objectives: analyze theoretical and methodological approaches to risk definition; study the varieties of global risks; establish the relationship between global and phenomenological risks.
   Methodology. The study uses methods of synthesis and analysis to identify the features of the interpretation of the term "risk", to classify global risks. Theoretical generalizations and empirical studies are carried out on the basis of monographic and abstract-logical methods, author's works, official statistics.
   Results. In modern realities, the problem of risk acquires one of the significant characteristics of the everyday life of a person, his social practices. In the essence of risk, the evaluative activity of the actor of indicators of reality and the focus on its transformation is manifested. The objective-subjective concept of risk represents the dualistic ambiguous essence of risk. From the point of view of phenomenology, risks are considered as a factor in the existence and reliability of the existence of a person. As a result of the collapse of everyday reality, the risk is revealed as an exacerbation of the "worlds of life".
   Conclusions. The proposed features of risks make it possible to qualitatively describe global and phenomenological risks, classify them into vertical and horizontal ones. The vertical level risks include economic, political, terrorism, information wars, etc. Horizontal level risks are represented by environmental, social, cultural risks, reorganization of social stratification, etc. Global risks in modern society are divergent in nature, penetrate into the internal structures of society and become a factor of phenomenological risks at the level of everyday social practices of an individual.

About the Authors

L. V. Kilimova
Southwest State University
Russian Federation

Lyudmila V. Kilimova, Cand. of Sci. (Sociological), Head of the Department of Philosophy and Sociology

50 Let Oktyabrya Str. 94, Kursk 305040 



D. Yu. Tatarenkova
Southwest State University
Russian Federation

Daria Yu. Tatarenkova, Student of the Department of Philosophy and Sociology

50 Let Oktyabrya Str. 94, Kursk 305040 



O. O. Nishnianidze
Southwest State University
Russian Federation

Ol'ga O. Nishnianidze, Cand. of Sci. (Sociological), Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Sociology 

50 Let Oktyabrya Str. 94, Kursk 305040 



References

1. Aleynikov A. V., Shiryayev E. Global'nyye riski: sotsial'no-psikhologicheskiye aspekty [Global risks: socio-psychological aspects]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 2020, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 118-123.

2. Giddens E. Sud'ba, risk i bezopasnost' [Fate, risk and safety]. THESIS, 1994, no. 5, pp. 107‒134.

3. Fufina N. K., Devyatkin S. V. [Global risks in modern society]. Nauka molodykh: vyzovy i perspektivy. Sbornik materialov Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Science of the young: challenges and prospects. Collection of materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference]. Veliky Novgorod, Novgorod Branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation, 2019, pp. 223-227. (In Russ.)

4. Din M. Pravitel'nost': vlast' i pravleniye v sovremennykh obshchestvakh [Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Societies] Moscow, Delo Publ., 2016. 590 p.

5. Dal' V. I. Tolkovyy slovar' zhivogo russkogo yazyka [Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Russian Language]; ed. by I. A. Boduena de Kurtene. Moscow, TERRA – Knizhnyy klub Publ., 1998. 272 p.

6. Avdeyeva N. N., eds. Bol'shoy psikhologicheskiy slovar' [Big psychological dictionary]; ed. by B. G. Meshcheryakova, V. P. Zinchenko. 4th ed. Moscow, AST Publ., Sankt-Peterburg, Praym-Yevroznak Publ., 2009. 811 p.

7. Sotsiologicheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' [Sociological Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow, Norma, NORMA- INFRA Publ., 2000. 480 p.

8. Al'gin A. P. Risk i yego rol' v obshchestvennoy zhizni [Risk and its role in public life]. Moscow, Mysl' Publ., 1989. 187 p.

9. Nayt F. Risk, neopredelennost' i pribyl' [Risk, uncertainty and profit]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2003. 359 p.

10. Obshchestvo riska i chelovek: ontologicheskiy i tsennostnyy aspekty [Risk society and man: ontological and value aspects]; ed. by V. B. Ust'yantseva. Saratov, Nauka Publ., 2006. 289 p.

11. Afanas'yev I. A. Filosofskiye osnovaniya teorii sotsial'nykh riskov [Philosophical foundations of the theory of social risks]. Saratov, Saratov State Socio-Economic University Publ., 2006, pp. 34-35.

12. Ivanov O. B. Global'nyye riski i novyye vyzovy chelovecheskoy tsivilizatsii [Global risks and new challenges of human civilization]. Etap: ekonomicheskaya teoriya, analiz, praktika = Stage: Economic Theory, Analysis, Practice, 2020, no. 2, pp. 7-20.

13. Nestik T. A. Global'nyye riski kak psikhologicheskiy fenomen [Global risks as a psychological phenomenon]. Puti k miru i bezopasnosti = Pathways to Peace and Security, 2016, no. 1 (50), pp. 24-38.

14. Solov'yev A. I. Global'nyye riski: sovremennoye sostoyaniye i perspektivy prognozirovaniya [Global risks: current state and forecasting prospects]. Razvitiye i bezopasnost' = Development and Security, 2020, no. 1 (5), pp. 80-86.

15. Kuznetsov V. N. Kul'tura bezopasnosti: Sotsiologicheskoye issledovaniye [Safety Culture: A Case Study]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2001. P. 44.

16. Ageyev A. I. Dinamika i struktura global'nykh riskov [Dynamics and structure of global risks]. Strategiya grazhdanskoy zashchity: problemy i issledovaniya = Civil Protection Strategy: Problems and Research, 2013, vol. 3, no. 2 (5), pp. 7-8.

17. Ivanov A. V. Puti kontseptualizatsii riskov v sotsial'nom poznanii [Ways of conceptualizing risks in social cognition]. Obshchestvo riska i chelovek: ontologicheskiy i tsennostnyy aspekty [Risk society and man: ontological and value aspects]; ed. by V. B. Ust'yantseva. Saratov, Nauka Publ., 2006, pp. 10-29.

18. Raydugin D. S., Zhigayeva K. V. Sotsiokul'turnyye aspekty formirovaniya sotsial'noy real'nosti v metodologicheskom pole sotsial'noy fenomenologii [Sociocultural aspects of the formation of social reality in the methodological field of social phenomenology]. Chelovek. Obshchestvo. Inklyuziya = Man. Society. Inclusion, 2015, no. 4 (24), pp. 16-20.

19. Luman N. Ponyatiye riska [The concept of risk]. THESIS, 1994, no. 5, pp. 135-160.

20. The Global Risks Report 2021. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/reports/theglobal-risks-report-2021. (accessed 22.06.2022)

21. Kilimova L. V. [Social risks of the digital society]. Gumanitarnyye problemy sovremennosti. Sbornik statey IV Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Humanitarian problems of modernity. Collection of articles on IV scientific-practical International Conference]. Kursk, Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 2022, pp. 100-104. (In Russ.)

22. Sedik T. S., Xu R. A Vicious Cycle: How Pandemics Lead to Economic Despair and Social Unrest. IMF Working Papers. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2020/10/16/A-Vicious-Cycle-How-Pandemics-Lead-to-Economic-Despair-and-SocialUnrest-498065. (accessed 17.06.2022)

23. The Global Risks Report 2022. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2022.pdf. (accessed 22.06.2022)


Review

For citations:


Kilimova L.V., Tatarenkova D.Yu., Nishnianidze O.O. Global Risks as a Trigger of Phenomenological Risks. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2022;12(6):183-197. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2022-12-6-183-197

Views: 152


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-1552 (Print)