Social Quality of Life in the Lens of Quantum Synergetic Anthropology

   Relevance. The concept of social quality of life logically fits into the dialectical-synergetic direction of modern philosophy of science. The issues of interfacing the social quality of life with the psychology of physicality and quantum-synergetic ontologies of a person are particularly relevant today; the coordination of value regulations for understanding "quality" life, "quality" habitat, "quality" activity, etc., exacerbating the systemic revision of the philosophical and ideological foundation.
   The purpose of this study is to analyze the meaning, functions and role of the social quality of life in the life of a person and society from the perspective of quantum synergetic anthropology.
   The objectives consideration of the "body of society" by seven levels of corporeality, as well as the establishment of the role and significance of the social quality of life in the synthetic body-object ontology of society.
   Methodology. Physicality, as an epistemological phenomenon, is most widely represented in the quantumsynergetic anthropology of V.G. Budanov, who rethought the approach to the study of the human body by E. Husserl.
   Results. The social quality of life has been studied and presented in the perspective of the quantum-synergetic methodology, its aspects of origin and implementation have been established.
    Conclusions. The social quality of life in the aspect of quantum-synergetic methodology is revealed through seven levels of physicality, or rather, it arises not at the very level of physicality, but at the junctions, the boundaries of the transition from one level to another, thereby forming a certain social practice (a set of criteria, indicators, assessments; vector of development), which is the forerunner of a full-fledged cultural tradition. The social quality of life can be assessed and presented only under the condition of a one–time multitemporality of the attributes of being, and in a narrower sense ‒ the spheres of life of society and man. At the same time, this whole system is impossible without the main (main) actors – society in general and man in particular. That is why the social quality of life is primarily aimed at satisfying the system of human and social needs, and the means and methods are selected depending on the existing landscape and the possibility of its change.

1. Subetto A. I. Social'noe kachestvo zhizni v teoreticheskoj sisteme sovremennogo kvalitativizma [Social quality of life in the theoretical system of modern qualitivism]. Nauka i social'noe kachestvo = Science and Social Quality, 2014, no. 2 (2), pp. 21-40.

2. Subetto A. I. Teoriya kachestva zhizni [Theory of quality of life]; ed. by A. A. Gorbunova. St. Petersburg, Asterion Publ., 2017. 280 p.

3. Mayakova A. V. Slozhnostnoe kachestvo kak aktual'naya kategoriya postneklassicheskoj filosofii i nauki [Complexity quality as an actual category of postnonclassical philosophy and science]. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki = Philosophy of Science and Technology, 2018, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 116-127.

4. Princip celostnosti i nauki o kul'ture. Trudy nauchnogo seminara po celostnosti [The principle of integrity and the science of culture. Proceedings of the scientific seminar on integrity]; ed. by E. G. Sokolova, Yu. N. Solonina. Moscow, Etnosocium Publ., 2014. 142 p.

5. Budanov V. G. Metodologiya sinergetiki v postneklassicheskoj nauke i v obrazovanii [Methodology of synergetics in postnonclassical science and education]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2009. 240 p.

6. Arshinov V. I., Svirskij Ya. I. Slozhnostnyj mir i ego nablyudatel'. Chast' pervaya [The complex world and its observer. Part One]. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki = Philosophy of Science and Technology, 2015, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 70-84.

7. Arshinov V. I., Svirskij YA. I. Slozhnostnyj mir i ego nablyudatel'. Chast' vtoraya [The complex world and its observer. Part Two]. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki = Philosophy of Science and Technology, 2016, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 78-91.

8. Stepin V. S. Teoreticheskoe znanie [Theoretical knowledge]. Moscow, ProgressTradiciya Publ., 2000. 744 p.

9. Mayakova A. V. Osnovy sovremennogo kvalitativizma [Fundamentals of modern qualitivism]. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Menedzhment = Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics, Sociology and Management, 2022, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 264‒271.

10. Telesnost' kak epistemologicheskij fenomen [Physicality as an epistemological phenomenon]; ed. by I. A. Beskova. Moscow, IFRAN Publ., 2009. 231 p.

11. Gusserl' E. Kartezianskie meditacii [Cartesian meditations]. Moscow, Akademicheskij proekt Publ., 2010. 229 p.

12. Averin Yu. P., Sushko V. A. Koncepciya kachestva zhizni v sovremennyh sociologicheskih teoriyah [The concept of quality of life in modern sociological theories]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Sotsiologiya. Politologiya = Proceedings Saratov University. A New Series. Series: Sociology. Political Science, 2019, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 4–11.

13. Rozhdestvenskaya S. M., Klochkov V. V. Paradigma "Bol'shih vyzovov" v sisteme strategicheskogo planirovaniya nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya [The paradigm of "Big challenges" in the system of strategic planning of scientific and technological development]. Rossiya: tendencii i perspektivy razvitiya = Russia: Trends and Prospects of Development, 2017, vol. 12, pt. 3, pp. 389-394.

14. Klochkov V. V. Vzaimosvyaz' strategij nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo i prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossii [Interrelation of strategies of scientific, technological and spatial development of Russia]. Rossiya: tendencii i perspektivy razvitiya = Russia: Trends and Prospects of Development, 2019, pt. 1, pp. 101-106.

15. Mekhanik A. Novye otvety na bol'shie [New answers to big challenges]. Available at: https://stimul.online/articles/sreda/novye-otvety-na-bolshie-vyzovy/. (accessed 17.07.2022)

16. Kolmykova M. A. Vyzovy sovremennogo obshchestva: osobennosti i tipologiya [Challenges of modern society: features and typology]. Gumanitarnye, social'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki = Humanities, Socio-Economic and Social Sciences, 2021, no. 8, pp. 39-42.

17. Titov V. V. Nacional'naya bezopasnost' sovremennoj Rossii: gumanitarnye i sociokul'turnye vyzovy [National security of modern Russia: humanitarian and socio-cultural challenges]. Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, parvo = Society: Politics, Economics, Law, 2020, no. 9(86), pp. 16-19.

18. Belokonev S. Yu., Titov V. V., Usmanova Z. R. Rossijskaya nacional'nogosudarstvennaya identichnost' pered vyzovami nachala HKHI veka [Russian national-state identity before the challenges of the beginning of the XXI century]. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Politologiya = Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Political Science, 2019, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 90-98.

19. Mayakova A. V. [Digital transformation of human life and society]. Problema transformacii cheloveka v usloviyah krizisa tekhnogennoj civilizacii. Sbornik nauchnyh statej, Kursk, 30 avgusta 2021 goda [The problem of human transformation in the conditions of the crisis of technogenic civilization. Collection of scientific articles, Kursk, August 30, 2021]. Kursk, Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 2021, pp. 50-66. (In Russ.)

20. Artamonova Ya. S., Lihanova I. V. Cifrovizaciya gosudarstva i nacional'naya bezopasnost' [Digitalization of the state and national security]. Voprosy politologii = Questions of Political Science, 2020, vol. 10, no. 4 (56), pp. 1093–1099.