Preview

Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management

Advanced search

Regional-Sectoral Imbalance of Regions: Assessment of Differentiation in Terms of Socio-Ecological and Economic Indicators Using a 3D Prism

https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2023-13-2-191-205

Abstract

Relevance. The problems of sustainable and balanced socio-ecological and economic development of the regions of Russia, especially under the influence of exogenous shocks, it is necessary to pay special attention to the issues of assessing the differentiation of regions, which is based on the triune concept of sustainable development. The development of a scientific and methodological apparatus for studying and modeling socio-ecological and economic relationships for assessing the sustainable development of regions today seems relevant. In the article, the author highlights the role of modeling, which allows using complex indices to assess the differentiation of regions.

The purpose is to study and analyze the impact on the economy of exogenous shocks in the regional context, previously ‒ the COVID‒19 pandemic, and then ‒ the aggravation of geopolitical tensions.

Objectives: to analyze indicative indicators reflecting the balanced development of socio-economic and environmental relationships, and to assess the impact of exogenous shocks on their change; to develop 3D and 4D models reflecting the situation of the subjects of the Russian Federation with a separate reflection of the environmental burden on the regions.

Methodology. The methodological approach to the study of the situation of the regions of the Russian Federation using 3D and 4D modeling within the framework of the triune socio-ecological-economic concept using indicators included the use of economic-statistical and comparative analysis of the study of the dynamics of changes in indicators in the field of economic, social and environmental indicators in the context of the subjects of the Russian Federation; methods of classification, analysis and synthesis to identify differentiation of regions and the level of their imbalance.

Results. The scientific novelty of the research results consists in the development of a scientific and methodological apparatus for studying and modeling socio-ecological and economic relationships to assess the sustainable development of the region under the influence of macroeconomic shocks.

Conclusions. Based on the analysis of the situation of the regions in all three directions (economic, social and environmental) within the framework of the three-pronged concept of sustainable development, according to the three-sided prism, it can be stated that environmental issues in the regions are not given due attention and that priority is given to the short-term settlement of "emergency" situations.

About the Author

E. A. Borkova
St. Petersburg State University of Economics
Russian Federation

Elena A. Borkova, Cand. of Sci. (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of General Economic Theory and History of Economic Thought

2 Sadovaya Str., St. Petersburg 191023

Researcher ID: M-2930-5019



References

1. Borkova E. A., Vatlina L. V., Kurbanov A. Kh., Plotnikov V. A. Otsenka vliyaniya makroekonomicheskikh shokov na ustoichivost' razvitiya sektorov natsional'noi ekonomiki i problemy ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti [Assessment of the impact of macroeconomic shocks on the sustainability of the development of sectors of the national economy and problems of economic security]. St. Petersburg, Info-da Publ., 2022. 248 p.

2. Strategiya prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii na period do 2025 goda (proekt) [Strategy for the spatial development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025 (draft)]. Minekonomrazvitiya RF [Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation]. Available at: http://economy.gov.ru/minec/activity/sections/planning/sd/201817081. (accessed 18.01.2023)

3. Voroshilov N. V., Gubanova E. S. Differentsiatsiya territorii i mekhanizm ee snizheniya [Differentiation of territories and the mechanism of its reduction]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz = Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2018, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 57‒72. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2018.6.60.4

4. Rastvortseva S. N., Grinev N. A. Konkurentosposobnost' regiona v usloviyakh globalizatsii [Competitiveness of the region in the context of globalization]. Belgorod, CONSTANT Publ., 2014. 187 p.

5. Reiting innovatsionnykh regionov Rossii [Rating of innovative regions of Russia]. Available at: https://www.i.regions.org>reiting/reiting...razvitiya/2016/. (accessed 18.01.2023)

6. Gde nakhoditsya neravenstvo [Where is the inequality]. Available at: https://www.vedomosti. ru/opinion/articles/2018/07/24 / 776307-nahoditsya-neravenstvo (accessed 17.01.2023)

7. Reiting sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo polozheniya regionov – 2021. Infografika [Rating of the socio-economic situation of the regions – 2021. Infographics]. RiaReiting [Ria Rating]. Available at: https://riarating.ru/ infografika/20210531/630201353.html. (accessed 10.02.2023)

8. Kakie regiony Rossii bol'she vsego zavisyat ot deneg iz tsentra [Which regions of Russia depend most on money from the center]. Available at: https://www.rbc.ru/economics/28/01/2022/ 61f29f439a79470585f7f0d5. (accessed 10.01.2023)

9. Miropolskii D. Iu., Borkova E. A., Vatlina L. V., Kapelyuk Z. A. Structural effects of regional reproduction in Russia: impact on market and administrative coordination relationship. Exceling Tech, 2019, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 824–833.

10. Miropolskii D. Iu., Selishcheva Т. А., Diatlov S. A., Lomakina I. B., Borkova E. A. Regional Supply Chain Structure and Centralization of the Economy of Russia. Exceling Tech, 2018, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 684–692.

11. Tatarstan otpravil trillion rublei v Moskvu: vygodno li byt' regionom-donorom [Tatarstan sent a trillion rubles to Moscow: is it profitable to be a donor region?]. Available at: https://www.tatarinform.ru/news/tatarstan-otpravil-trillion-rublei-v-moskvu-razbiraemsya-mnogo-eto-ili-malo-5863622. (accessed 11.01.2023)

12. Innovatsionnaya Rossiya — 2020. Strategiya innovatsionnogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii na period do 2020 goda [Innovative Russia // 2020. Strategy for Innovative Development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2020]. Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii [Ministry of Economic Development of Russia]. Available at: http://www.economy.gov.ru. (accessed 21.01.2023)

13. Menyayushchiisya landshaft mirovoi ekonomiki [The changing landscape of the global economy]. Perspektivy razvitiya mirovoi ekonomiki. Byulleten' osnovnykh prognozov PRME [Prospects for the development of the world economy. Bulletin of the main forecasts of the PRME]. Available at: https://www.imf.org>/media/Files…WEO/2017/January...0117r.ashx. (accessed 18.01.2023)

14. Regiony Rossii. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie pokazateli [Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicators]. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/ catalog/doc_1138623506156. (accessed 14.01.2023)

15. Trekhkomponentnye sistemy [Three-component systems]. Available at: https://studfile.net/ preview/5228494. (accessed 17.01.2023)

16. Tatarkin A. I. Regional'naya napravlennost' ekonomicheskoi politiki Rossiiskoi Federatsii kak instituta prostranstvennogo obustroistva territorii [Regional targeting of the economic policy of the Russian Federation as an institution of regional spatial development]. Ekonomika regiona = Economics of the Region, 2016, vol. 12, is. 1, pp. 9–27.

17. Chekmarev V. V. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie regionov Rossii [Economic development of regions of Russia]. Kostroma, Kostroma State University Publ., 2017, p. 332.

18. Fomichev V. T., Ermakova T. A., Akat'ev V. V. Diagrammy sostoyaniya trekhkomponentnykh sistem [Akatiev. Diagrams of the state of three-component systems]. Volgograd, Volga Publishing House Publ., 2018. 36 p.

19. Plotnikov V. A., Yusufova A. M. Ustoichivost' regional'nykh ekonomicheskikh sistem v usloviyakh makroekonomicheskikh shokov [Sustainability of regional economic systems in the context of macroeconomic shocks]. Teoriya i praktika servisa: ekonomika, sotsial'naya sfera, tekhnologii = Theory and Practice of Service: Economics, Social Sphere, Technologies, 2022, no. 3 (53), pp. 5‒9.

20. Borkova E. A., Kuznetsova D. S., Ziryukova P. A. [Digital tools on the way to sustainable development]. Ctrategiya sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya obshchestva: uprav-lencheskie, pravovye, khozyaistvennye aspekty. Sbornik nauchnykh statei XII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [The strategy of socio-economic development of society: managerial, legal, economic aspects. Collection of scientific articles of the XII International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Kursk, Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 2022, pp. 50‒54. (In Russ.)

21. Luft K. S., Pirogova E. D., Borkova E. A. Investitsii kak faktor ustoichivogo razvitiya ekonomicheskoi sistemy v Rossii [Investments as a factor in the sustainable development of the economic system in Russia]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo = Economics and Entrepreneurship, 2022, no. 9 (146), pp. 205‒207.


Review

For citations:


Borkova E.A. Regional-Sectoral Imbalance of Regions: Assessment of Differentiation in Terms of Socio-Ecological and Economic Indicators Using a 3D Prism. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2023;13(2):191-205. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2023-13-2-191-205

Views: 187


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-1552 (Print)