Psychiatric approach to religious-mystical experience: a paradigm shift (philosophical conceptualization)

Relevance. As the psychopathology of religious experience developed in the second half of the 20th – early 21st century, a noticeable trend was the transition to a paradigm that orients psychiatric science toward a differentiated approach to religious-mystical experience. The change of paradigms requires the implementation of philosophical reflection through the prism of interdisciplinary interaction.
The purpose is to reveal the prerequisites and first results of the paradigm shift in psychiatric science in the field of studying religious-mystical experience.
Objectives: to explicate the disciplinary matrix of the psychiatric approach to the study of the phenomenon of religious mysticism; to demonstrate the limits of reductionism in the psychotopathological approach to religiousmystical experience; to explore the directions of integration of psychiatry of religious-mystical experience into the interdisciplinary space and the implementation of new approaches as prerequisites for paradigmatic changes in its discourse.
Methodology. When considering the approaches of representatives of psychiatric science regarding the nature and essence of religious and mystical, a comparative analysis was used. The study of the diversity of psychiatric approaches to religious and mystical experience was carried out based on the application of the principle of systematicity. The principle of historicism was used to identify the logic of the development of the psychiatric approach to mystical experiences in the space of interdisciplinary dialogue and interaction.
Results. The main directions of development of the approach of domestic and foreign psychiatric science to religious and mystical experiences are systematized. The position is substantiated that, unlike the psychology of religion, the psychiatric approach, from the very beginning of its emergence in the late 19th - early 20th centuries, adhered to the implementation of a scientific program aimed at studying these experiences as pathological phenomena (religious psychoses). Over time, there was a rejection of the complete reduction of religious and mystical experiences to madness.
Conclusions. As a result of paradigm shifts in psychiatric science, a new research program emerged that examined the array of religious-mystical experience through the prism of “normal – pathological.” Thanks to paradigm shifts, certain layers of religious-mystical experience began to be viewed as an integral part of spiritual culture and a component of mental health.

1. Jones H. An introduction to the study of mysticism. Albany: State University of New York Press; 2021. 297 p.

2. Lamm J.A. (ed.) The Wiley-Blackwell companion to Christian mysticism. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2017. 672 p.

3. Shugurov M.V., Mozzhilin S.I. Religious mysticism and the psychology of religion: on the question of the limits of reduction. Part 2. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Menedzhment = Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2023;13(3):256-269. (In Russ.) https:// doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2023-13-3-256-269

4. Kondratiev F.V. Psychiatric aspect in the analysis of the consequences of the activities of modern cult neoplasms. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal = Russian Psychiatric Journal. 1997;(2):25-29. (In Russ.)

5. Schneider K.K. Towards an Introduction to Religious Psychopathology. Nezavisimyi psikhiatricheskii zhurnal = Independent Psychiatric Journal.1999;(1):5-13. (In Russ.)

6. James W. The diversity of religious experience. Moscow: Nauka; 1993. 432 p. (In Russ.)

7. Jaspers K. General psychopathology. Moscow: Praktika; 1997. 1056 р. (In Russ.)

8. Greenberg D., Witztum E. Problems in the treatment of religious patients. American Journal of Psychotherapy. 1991;45(4):554-565.

9. Leroy E.-B. Psychological interpretation of «intellectual visions» among Christian mystics. Review of the History of Religions. 1907;55:1-50. (In Franch)

10. Pashkovsky V.E., Zislin I.M. Religious-mystical states as a psychiatric problem. Social'naya i klinicheskaya psihiatriya = Social and Clinical Psychiatry. 2005;15(1):81-88 (In Russ.)

11. Grunebaum G.E. Parallelism, interpenetration and mutual influence in relations between Arab and Byzantine philosophy, literature and religious thought. In: The main features of the Arab- Muslim culture. Moscow: Nauka; 1981. 227 p. (In Russ.)

12. Gel'pakh V. Mental epidemics. Saint Petersburg: Izdanie Literaturno-meditsinskogo zhurnala doctora Oksa; 1908. 65 p. (In Russ.)

13. Bartold V.V. Islam. In: Works. Vol. 6. Moscow: Nauka; 1966. 785 p. (In Russ.)

14. Serbian V.P. A guide to the study of mental illness. 2nd ed. Moscow: Studencheskaya meditsinskaya izdatel'skaya komissiya im. N. I. Pirogova; 1912. 654 p. (In Russ.)

15. Griesinger V. Mental illnesses for doctors and students. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel'stvo V.O. Kovalevskogo; 1881. 558 p. (In Russ.)

16. Kraepelin E. Introduction to the psychiatric clinic. Vol. 1. Moscow: GIZ; 1923. 890 p. (In Russ.)

17. Kraft-Ebing R. Textbook of psychiatry. 2nd ed. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel'stvo K. L. Rikker; 1890. 870 p. (In Russ.)

18. Berdyaev N. Muddy faces. Moscow: Canon; 2004. 445 p. (In Russ.)

19. Pashkovsky V.E. On the clinical significance of the religious-archaic delusional complex. Social'naya i klinicheskaya psihiatriya = Social and Clinical Psychiatry. 2021;22(2):43-48. (In Russ.)

20. Cardena E., Lynn St. J., Krippner St. Varieties of anomalous experience: examining the scientific evidence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2000. 476 p.

21. Weitbrecht H.J. Beiträge zur religionspsychopathologie: in particular zur psychopathologie der konversion. Heidelberg: Scherer; 1948.187 p. (In German)

22. Greenberg D., Witztum E. Problems in the treatment of religious patients. American Journal of Psychotherapy. 1991;45(4):554-565.

23. Walther G. Phenomenology of the mystic. 3rd ed. Olten: Walter Verlag; 1976. 265 p. (In Germ.)

24. Mentzos S. Textbook of psychodynamics. The function of the dysfunctionality of mental disorders. Göttingen: Vandehoeck & Ruprecht; 2015. 302 p. (In German)

25. Korsakov S.S. Questions of clinical psychiatry. Moscow: Librocom; 2010. 261 p. (In Russ.)

26. Deikman A. Experimental meditation. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 1963;136(4):329-343.

27. Dean S.R. Psychiatry and mysticism. Chicago: Nelson-Hall; 1975. 424 р.

28. Lukoff D. The diagnosis of mystical experience with psychotic features. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology. 1985;17(2):155-181.

29. Pargament K.I. (ed.) APA handbook of psychology, religion and spirituality. Vol. 2. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2013. 1496 p.

30. Bitēna D.K., Mārtinsone K. Mystical experience has a stronger relationship with spiritual intelligence than with schizotypal personality traits and psychotic symptoms. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2021;(11):137-153. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000312

31. Utsch M. Religionspsychological explanations for extraordinary experiences. In: Freun H., Pfeifer S. (eds.) Spiritualization or psychologization? Interpretation and treatment of extraordinary religious experiences. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 2019. P. 35-51. (In German)

32. Dehoff S., Massey J. Spirit as a separate dimension of human nature: relevance to psychotherapy. Pastoral Psychology. 2022;71(4):511-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-022-01012-4

33. Santos-Silva A., Lopes Silva T., Serra J.G. Lima Argimon I.I. The impasse of anomalous experiences in mental health: maturity, social support and identity as indicators of benign schizotypy in a Brazilian sample. International Journal of Latin America Religions. 2022;(6):211-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41603-022-00182-6

34. Rodionova Yu.V., Chasovskikh G.A., Taratukhin E.O. The factor of spirituality and religiosity in clinical work: conceptualization of the problem. Rossiiskii kardiologicheskii zhurnal = Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(9):46-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/0.15829/1560-4071-2020-4041