Preview

Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management

Advanced search

The Situation of a Pandemic as a Stress Test for the Resilience of an Individual: Problems and Prospects for Sociological Assessing Existential Modes in the Context of S. Muddy Method

Abstract

Relevance. The problem of the resilience of the individual acquires particular relevance during a pandemic associated with the rapid spread of the COVID-19 coronavirus, due to the fact that it affects all spheres of human vitality.
The purpose of the article was to achieve an understanding of which human resources are currently the most vulnerable, and which may not be able to withstand after a certain time, as well as to put forward an assumption about the most positive variant of the development of events for the vitality parameter.
The objectives of the study in connection with the goal was to appeal to the resource of vitality in a person. Therefore, the analysis of resilience was based on comprehending the results of the survey and conclusions about how exactly the components of resilience contribute to adaptability, the development of coping strategies that help people overcome the pandemic of fear and anxiety.
Methodology. We used S. Maddy's hardiness test (in the adaptation of D. A. Leontiev, E. I. Rasskazova, who, with the consent of S. Maddy, retaining the structure of the original test, introduced additional items). Resilience is an integral indicator and is calculated as the sum of three other indicators: involvement, control and risk acceptance.
Results. Analysis of the data of the study of the parameters of resilience allows us to conclude: the situation of a pandemic reduces the resilience of a person. The parameter of involvement of students participating in the research is significantly lower than the same parameter of students who do not face similar difficulties. The number of areas and spheres of activity that fascinated and interested a person decreased, this is evidence of a decrease in the level of pleasure from doing what has become less accessible.
Conclusions. Distance today can be viewed not as a limitation, but as an opportunity for existential experience, in a certain sense, transcending beyond the usual way, a horizon that opens the possibility of self-creativity and a more complete expression of one's individuality.

About the Authors

V. O. Sheleketa
Belgorod State Technological University named after V. G. Shukhov; Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law
Russian Federation

Vladislav O. Sheleketa, Doctor of Philosophical Science, Professor Department of Theory and Methodology of Science

46 Kostyukova str., Belgorod 308012

116a Sadovaya str., Belgorod 308023



N. O. Kazintseva
Belgorod State Technological University named after V. G. Shukhov
Russian Federation

Natalia O. Kazintseva, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Russian Language and Natural Sciences, Post-Graduate Student of the Department of Theory and Methodology of Science

46 Kostyukova str., Belgorod 308012



References

1. Enikolopov S. N., Boyko O. M., Medvedeva T. I., Vorontsova O. Yu., Kazmina O. Yu. Dinamika psikhologicheskikh reaktsii na nachal'nom etape pandemii COVID-19 [Dynamics of psychological reactions at the initial stage of the COVID-19 pandemic]. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological and Pedagogical Research, 2020, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 108-126.

2. Pandemiya kak vyzov sub"ektivnomu blagopoluchiyu: trevoga i sovladanie [Pandemic as a challenge to subjective well-being: anxiety and coping]. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiyai psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2020, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 90-108.

3. Armor S. Psychologists study mental health and social impacts of COVID-19. Available at: http://www.ivyroses.com здоровье/психологическое здоровье… исследование-COVID-19... (accessed 10.12.2020)

4. Boyko O. M., Medvedeva T. I., Enikolopov S. N., Vorontsova O. Yu., Kazmina O. Yu. Psikhologicheskoe sostoyanie lyudei v period pandemii COVID-19 i misheni psikhologicheskoi raboty [The psychological state of people during the COVID-19 pandemic and the targets of psychological work]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological Research, 2020, vol. 13, no. 70, p. 1.

5. Odintsova M. A. Psikhologiya zhiznestoikosti [The psychology of resilience]. Moscow, FLINT, Nauka Publ., 2015. 296 p.

6. Maddy S. Smysloobrazovanie v protsesse prinyatiya reshenii [Meaning formation in the decisionmaking process]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 2005, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 87-101.

7. Fominova A. N. Zhiznestoikost' lichnosti [Personality resilience]. Moscow, Moscow State Pedagogical University Publ., 2012, 152 p.

8. Maddi S. R. Hardiness Training at Illinois Bell Telephone. Health promotion evaluation; ed. by J. P. Opatz. Stevens Point (WI), National Wellness Institute Publ., 1987, pp. 101-115.

9. Florian V., Mikulincer M., Taubman O. Does hardiness contribute to mental health during a stressful real-life situation? The roles of appraisal and coping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 687–695.

10. Leontiev D. A. Lichnostnoe v lichnosti: lichnostnyi potentsial kak osnova samodeterminatsii [Personal in personality: personal potential as the basis of self-determination]. Uchenye zapiski kafedry obshchei psikhologii MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova [Scientific Notes of the Department of General Psychology of the Lomonosov Moscow State University]; ed. by B. S. Bratusya, D. A. Leontyeva. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2002, is. 1, pp. 56–65.

11. Evtushenko E. A. Zhiznestoikost' lichnosti kak psikhologicheskii fenomen [Personality resilience as a psychological phenomenon]. Available at: https://www.b17.ru/blog/100903/. (accessed 07.12.2020)

12. Rasskazova E. I., Gordeeva T. O., Osin E. N. Koping-strategii v strukture deyatel'nosti i samoregulyatsii: psikhometricheskie kharakteristiki i vozmozhnosti primeneniya metodiki COPE [Coping strategies in the structure of activity and self-regulation: psychometric characteristics and the possibilities of using the COPE technique]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2013, no. 10 (1), pp. 82–118.

13. Erceg N., Ružojčić M., Galic Z. Misbehaving in the Corona Crisis: The Role of Anxiety and Unfounded Beliefs. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cgjw8. (accessed 17.12.2020)

14. Kalashnikova S. A. Smyslozhiznennye orientatsii, bazovye ubezhdeniya i strategii povedeniya v trudnykh zhiznennykh situatsiyakh lyudei s razlichnymi pokazatelyami zhiznestoikosti [Life-meaning orientations, basic beliefs and strategies of behavior in difficult life situations of people with different indicators of resilience]. Uchenye zapiski Zabaikal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika i psikhologiya = Scientific Notes of the Trans-Baikal State University. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology, 2011, no. 5, pp. 161-167.

15. Leontiev D. A., Rasskazova E. I. Test zhiznestoikosti [Vitality test]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2006. 63 p.

16. Sorokin M. Yu., Kasyanov E. D., Rukavishnikov G. V., Makarevich O. V., Neznanov N. G., Lutova N. B., Maso G. E. Struktura trevozhnykh perezhivanii, assotsiirovannykh s rasprostraneniem SOVID-19: dannye onlain-oprosa [The structure of anxious experiences associated with the spread of COVID-19: data from an online survey]. Vestnik RGMU = Bulletin of the Russian State Medical University, 2020, no. 3, pp. 77–84.

17. Makhnach A. V. Zhiznesposobnost' cheloveka kak predmet izucheniya v psikhologicheskoi nauke [Human vitality as a subject of study in psychological science]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 2017, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 5-16.

18. Shipovskaya V., Sergun A. I. [Viability as the ability to overcome difficult life situations]. Sotsial'naya sfera obshchestva: innovatsionnye tendentsii razvitiya. Sbornik materialov III Mezhdunarod. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Social sphere of society: innovative development trends. Collection of articles. materials III International. scientific-practical conf.]. Krasnodar, Institute of Economics and Management in Medicine and Social Sphere Publ., 2012, pp. 263–267.

19. Eschleman K. J., Bowling N. A., Alarcon G. M. A meta-analytic examination of hardiness. International Journal of Stress, 2010, no. 17(4), pp. 277–307.

20. Scrivner C., Johnson J. A., Kjeldgaard-Christiansen J., Clasen M. Pandemic Practice: Horror Fans and Morbidly Curious Individuals Are More Psychologically Resilient During the COVID-19 Pandemic. PsyArXiv, 2020, June 30.

21. Williams P. G., Wiebe D. J., Smith T. W. Coping processes as mediators of the relationship between Hardiness and health. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1992, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 237-255.

22. Wiebe D. J. Hardiness and stress moderation: A test of proposed mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991, no. 60 (1), pp. 89-99.

23. Gamba L. Latin American countries ease coronavirus restrictions. Available at: https:// www.aa.com.tr/en/americas/latin-american-countries-ease-coronavirus-restrictions/1812793. (accessed 15.12.2020)

24. Brown C., Salmi J. Putting fairness at the heart of higher education. Available at: https:// www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20200417094523729. (accessed 15.12.2020)


Review

For citations:


Sheleketa V.O., Kazintseva N.O. The Situation of a Pandemic as a Stress Test for the Resilience of an Individual: Problems and Prospects for Sociological Assessing Existential Modes in the Context of S. Muddy Method. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2021;11(2):180-191. (In Russ.)

Views: 176


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-1552 (Print)