Pandemic in World Philosophy
Abstract
Relevance. One of the events that we will remember 2020 by is the plunge of the world into the abyss of pandemic. The ubiquitous threat of infection affects everyone, awakening existential fear of death. In these conditions, there is an appeal to philosophy as a resource of courage and a way of comprehending reality, in which the vital need to be a member of the community is combined with the requirement to keep social distance.
The purpose of this article is to offer philosophical categories with which one can interpret the impact of the coronavirus crisis on society. The objectives of the work include analyzing the speeches of leading philosophers on the topic of the coronavirus crisis and collecting empirical information on the consequences of the pandemic.
The objectives of the work include analyzing the speeches of leading philosophers on the topic of the coronavirus crisis and collecting empirical information about the consequences of the pandemic.
Methodology. Complex systems studies are used as a prism, through which the transformations of political life during the crisis can be analyzed.
Results. When a society is faced with a systemic crisis, there are two alternative ways: the first-by the vector of increasing complexity, as a result of which functions are duplicated to protect against failures; the second, a possible response vector - by the vector of simplification, when the connections between the subjects are destroyed, their number is reduced and societies are rolled back to earlier stages of development.
Conclusions. If the reaction of the system is in line with the increasing level of complexity, then the system has coped with crisis. If there are practices that indicate a rollback to the "new Middle Ages", this means that the dominant parameters of order have given place to rudimentary practices. Coronavirus crisis may thus be considered a test on the dissipativity of governance structures as well as their ability to restore external connections and to equip the internal space isomorphously with the environment.
Supporting agencies: This work was supported by the RFBR under Project No. 19-311-90023 "Political Morphogenesis: a synergistic approach".
About the Author
A. V. Golofast
Institute of Philosophy Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anastasia V. Golofast, Researcher-Intern
12 Goncharnaya str., build. 1, Moscow 109240
References
1. Aronson L. Age, Complexity, and Crisis — A Prescription for Progress in Pandemic. Available at: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006115. (accessed 14.12.2020)
2. Carden D. From climate change to the coronavirus, complex adaptive systems thinking is key to handling crises. Available at: https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/opinion/article/3051137/climate-changecoronavirus-complex-adaptive-systems-thinking-key. (accessed 12.12.2020)
3. Fischer J. The Politics of the Pandemic. Available at: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/european-union-covid19-politics-by-joschka-fischer-2020-04?barrier=accesspaylog. (accessed 13.12.2020)
4. COVID-19 increases risk of modern slavery and complexity of compliance – Government extends the deadline to report. Available at: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=0c4d9fd7-f9a7-4256-883e-adbd48ab660c. (accessed 14.12.2020)
5. Bolden R. Leadership, Complexity and Change: Learning From the COVID-19 Pandemic.
6. Philosophy and coronavirus, how the pandemic is changing us. Available at: https:// www.mapfre.com/en/philosophy-coronavirus-pandemic/. (accessed 07.12.2020)
7. Peters M. Philosophy and Pandemic in the Postdigital Era: Foucault, Agamben, Žižek. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190280/. (accessed 09.12.2020)
8. Lourdes Velasquez G. The role of philosophy in the pandemic era. Available at: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7462448/. (accessed 07.12.2020)
9. Vanderekerckove W. COVID, Existentialism and Crisis Philosophy. Philosophy of Management, 2020, no. 19, pp. 127-132.
10. How pandemics have inspired art, music and literature. The Economist, 2020, May.
11. Glozman T., Vanner I. Nevetskiy filosof: pandemiya – eto vozmozhnost’ zamedlitsya [German philosopher: a pandemic is an opportunity to slow down]. Available at: https://www.vdw.com>…философ-пандемия-это...замедлиться...53004406. (accessed 11.12.2020)
12. Philosophy and coronavirus, how the pandemic is changing us // Reddacion Mapfre. Available at: https://www.mapfre.com/en/philosophy-coronavirus-pandemic/. (accessed 07.12.2020)
13. Peters M. Love and social distancing in the time of Covid-19: the philosophy and literature of pandemics. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00131857.2020.1750091. (accessed 08.12.2020)
14. Delanty G. Six political philosophers in search of a virus: critical perspectives on the coronavirus pandemic. Available at: http://www.ise.ac.uk…институт...Обсуждение...LEQSPaper156.pdf. (accessed 10.12.2020)
15. Mbembe A., Bercito D. The Pandemic Democratizes the Power to Kill. Available at: https:// www.journal-psychoanalysis.eu/the-pandemic-democratizes-the-power-to-kill-an-intyerview/. (accessed 10.12.2020)
16. Kristeva J. Humanity is rediscovering existential solitude, the meaning of limits and mortality. Available at: http://www.kristeva.fr”corriere-della-sera-29-03-2020-en.html. (accessed 17.12.2020)
17. Agamben G. Clarifications. Available at: https://itself.blog/2020/03/17/giorgio-agambenclarifications/. (accessed 09.12.2020)
18. Byung-Chul Han: Covid-19 has reduced us to a "society of survival". Available at: https://www.efe.com/efe/english/destacada/byung-chul-han-covid-19-has-reduced-us-to-a-society-ofsurvival/50000261-4244328. (accessed 12.12.2020)
19. Jaspers K. Smysl i naznacheniye istorii [The meaning and purpose of the story]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1991. 527 p.
20. Zielonka J., Bernini S. Pandemics and the politics of time. On the future of public and private life.
21. Davies S. COVID-19 and the Collapse of Complex Societies. Available at: https://reason.com/2020/06/02/covid-19-and-the-collapse-of-complex-societies-2/. (accessed 11.12.2020)
22. Jafar F. Applying Complexity Theory to the Coronavirus Crisis. Available at: https://www.eir.info/2020/04/18/applying-complexity-theory-to-the-coronavirus-crisis/. (accessed 10.12.2020).
23. Wernli D., eds. A complexity lens on the Covid-19 pandemic. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342765232_A_complexity_lens_on_the_COVID-19_pandemic. (accessed 12.12.2020)
24. Malinetsky G. G. Filosofiya i ideologiya budushchego v kontekste sovremennoy nauki [Philosophy and ideology of the future in the context of modern science]. Filosofskiye nauki = Philosophical Sciences, 2020, no. 63 (5), pp. 28-52.
25. Shen Ch., Bar-Yam Y., COVID-19: How to win. New England Complex Systems Institute, 2020, April 5.
26. Popper K. Nishcheta istoritsizma [The poverty of historicism]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1993. 187 p.
27. Fedotova V. G. Khorosheye obshchestvo [Good society]. Moscow, Progress – Traditsia Publ., 2005. 544 p.
28. Popper K. Predpolozheniya i oproverzheniya [Assumptions and refutations]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2008. 640 p.
29. Fedorova M. M. Frantsuzskaya politicheskaya filosofia: ot politicheskoy ratsional’nosti k paradoksam politicheskogo [French political philosophy: from political rationality to the paradoxes of the political]. Filosofskiye nauki = Philosophical Sciences, 2011, no. 5, pp. 83-97.
30. Shuper V. Ideya progressa posle pandemii koronavirusa [The idea of progress after the coronavirus pandemic]. Available at: http://www.globalaffairs.ru>articles...posle-koronavirusa/. (accessed 12.12.2020)
Review
For citations:
Golofast A.V. Pandemic in World Philosophy. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2021;11(2):250-258. (In Russ.)
Views:
149
Email this article 