An aggregated Model for Assessing the Readiness of the Municipal Economy to Develop in Accordance with the Smart City Concept

The relevance of the research topic is produced by the importance of forming an effective model for assessing the readiness of the economy of the municipality to develop in accordance with the Smart City concept, which would allow obtaining a reliable result on the implementation of this process.
The purpose of writing a scientific article is the formation of an aggregated model for assessing the readiness of the economy of a municipality to develop in accordance with the concept of Smart City.
Objectives. The research tasks are formed in the context of considering the existing assessment tools by the Smart City concept, with the subsequent formation and testing of an aggregated model for assessing the readiness of the economy of a municipality to develop in accordance with the Smart City concept.
Methodology. Research tools include the method of grouping data, the method of theoretical analysis, the method of abstraction from external changes, the method of classification, the method of modeling, the method of implicating data, the method of grouping information, the method of a set of empirical criteria, the method of statistical characteristics, the method of tabular summarization of materials.
The results of the study are as follows to considered the existing toolkit for assessing the Smart City concept, to formed an aggregated model for assessing the readiness of the economy of a municipal formation to develop in accordance with the Smart City concept, to tested an aggregated model for assessing the readiness of the economy of municipalities in the Orel region to develop in accordance with the Smart City concept.
Conclusions. The aggregated model of the economy of municipalities will create an initial stage of assessing the Smart City concept from the standpoint of the effectiveness and efficiency of the implementation of the results in the territorial planning system. The use of the aggregated model in practice will eliminate the problems of assessing the possibility of joint development of the economies of municipalities within the Smart City concept from the level of technologization of the city and digitalization of society, the issue of denying the influence on this process of other conditions for the functioning of the aggregated model and it’s falling into the zone of significance of the economies of municipalities.

1. Laufs J., Borrion H., Bradford B. Security and the Smart City: a systematic review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, vol. 55, pp. 102023.

2. Sibirskaja E. V., Oveshnikova L. V., Mihejkina L. A. Cifrovaja jekonomika Rossii: analiz sovremennogo sostojanija [Digital economy of Russia: analysis of the current state]. Jekonomicheskij analiz: teorija i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2020, vol. 19, no. 1 (496), pp. 4–24.

3. Horejsi P., Novikov K., Simon M. A smart factory in a Smart City: virtual and augmented reality in a smart assembly line. IEEE Access, 2020, vol. 8, pp. 94330–94340.

4. Valentej S. D., Bahtizin A. R., Kol'chugina A. V. Gotovnost' regional'nyh jekonomik k modernizacii [Readiness of regional economies for modernization]. Federalizm= Federalism, 2018, no. 3 (91), pp. 143–156.

5. Chernick H., Reschovsky A. State fiscal responses to welfare reform during recessions: lessons for the future. Public Budgeting & Finance. 2003. vol. 23, no. 3. pp. 3–21. о, no. 5 (20), pp. 109–122.

6. Kovach V. O. Forecasting the mechanism of the labor market management. Publіchne Urjaduvannja, 2019, no. 5 (20), pp. 109–122.7. Oveshnikova L. V. Primenenie analiticheskih procedur v strategicheskom planirovanii [Application of analytical procedures in strategic planning]. Nauchnoe obozrenie= Scientific Review, 2012, no. 6, pp. 463–470.

7. Oveshnikova L. V. Primenenie analiticheskih procedur v strategicheskom planirovanii [Application of analytical procedures in strategic planning]. Nauchnoe obozrenie= Scientific Review, 2012, no. 6, pp. 463–470.

8. Mukhametzhan S. O., Junusbekova G. A., Daueshov M. Ye. The management of urban development for the regional economic growth: the example of Kazakhstan. Economy of Region, 2020, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1285–1301.

9. Ahmed A. H. A. Formation organizational and economic mechanism of the firm’s competitiveness management. International Journal on Emerging Technologies, 2019, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 16–19.

10. Viana Carvalho Cravid H., Zaryadov I. S., Milovanova T. A. Queueing systems with different types of renovation mechanism and thresholds as the mathematical models of active queue management mechanism. Discrete and Continuous Models and Applied Computational Science, 2020, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 305–318.

11. Habib A., Prybutok V. R., Alsmadi D. Factors that determine residents’ acceptance of Smart City technologies. Behaviour and Information Technology, 2020, no. 6, pp. 610–623.

12. Horbyk V. Subsystems of the mechanism of state management of the natural and economic potential of the regions. Modern Science – Moderni Veda, 2019, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 5–15.

13. Pjen Ch. Novye tochki dlja razvitija umnogo goroda [New points for the development of a smart city]. Jekonomika i socium = Economy and Society, 2020, no. 11 (78), pp. 1208–1213.

14. Nikitskaja E. F. Rol' aglomeracij v razvitii regional'nogo segmenta nacional'noj innovacionnoj sistemy Rossii [The role of agglomerations in the development of the regional segment of the national innovation system of Russia]. Federalizm = Federalism, 2018, no. 2 (90), pp. 46–63.

15. Sibirskaya E. V., Volkova M. V., Oveshnikova L. V., Shchukina N. A., Lula P. Monitoring of regional labor markets and the maim trends of labor underutilization in Russia. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 2020.

16. Nikitin Iu., Kulchytskyy O. Organizational and economic mechanism of digital transformation of enterprise management. Modern Science – Moderni Veda, 2020, no. 1, pp. 40–47.

17. Hämäläinen M. A framework for a Smart City design: digital transformation in the Helsinki Smart City. Contributions to Management Science, 2020, pp. 63–86.

18. Buhval'd E. M., Valentej S. D., Odincova A. V. Jekonomicheskie problemy federalizma, regional'noj politiki i mestnogo samoupravlenija [Economic problems of federalism, regional policy and local self-government]. Vestnik Instituta jekonomiki Rossijskoj akademii nauk = Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2020, no.1, pp. 51–76.

19. Borodin V. A., Gagarina G. Ju. Jekonomicheskaja integracija regionov kak mehanizm vyravnivanija i rosta ih potencialov [Economic integration of regions as a mechanism of equalization and growth of their potentials]. Federalizm= Federalism, 2020, no. 2 (98), pp. 76–91.

20. Kirimtat A., Krejcar O., Kertesz A., Tasgetiren M. F. Future trends and current state of Smart City concepts: a survey. IEEE Access, 2020, vol. 8, pp. 86448–86467.

21. Ramirez Lopez L. J., Grijalba Castro A. I. Sustainability and resilience in Smart city planning: a review. Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 181.

22. Gagarina G. Ju., Sedova N. V. Principial'naja shema provedenija analiza resursnogo potenciala regiona [Schematic diagram of the analysis of the resource potential of the region]. Finansovyj menedzhment = Financial Management, 2018, no. 5, pp. 40–51.