Preview

Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management

Advanced search

Digital art as a mechanism for preserving traditional values

https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2026-16-1-270-281

Abstract

Relevance. With the development of digital technologies, the analysis of the form and content of contemporary digital art has become a priority research task, necessitating a discussion of the typology of digital art and the mechanisms by which societal values are shaped within a philosophical, cultural, value-based, and economic context. In today's context, the study of the mechanisms of digital art as a system for shaping traditional values is particularly relevant.
The purpose is to develop a conceptual framework for the mechanism by which digital art influences the formation of traditional value systems.
Objectives: to identify the essence of digital art and its attributes, develop its typology, and identify the channels through which digital art influences traditional value systems.
Methodology. The methodology is based on an interdisciplinary analysis of digital art interpretation based on value-based, cultural, technological, and economic approaches. To achieve this goal, methods of semantic and content analysis, a review of scientific research, and general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, and generalization were used.
Results. This article summarizes approaches to understanding digital art, identifies its attributes ‒ technological development, social interaction, and economic performance, and defines a matrix for the application of digital tools in contemporary art forms. Elements that determine the effectiveness of digital art as a communication channel in the formation of traditional values are identified: digital inclusivity, interactivity, social interaction, mass appeal, and institutionalization.
Conclusions. Understanding the multifaceted nature of digital art is the basis for examining its impact on traditional value systems. The results obtained will allow for the further development of approaches to the formation of creative industries and the art market, as well as the refinement of tools for the development of digital art markets.

About the Authors

E. V. Popov
Ural Institute of Management – branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Evgeny V. Popov, Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Doctor of Sciences (Physico-Mathematical), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director of the Center for Socio-Economic
Research

8 Marta Str. 66, Yekaterinburg 620144, Russian Federation



O. V. Komarova
Ural State University of Economics
Russian Federation

Oxana V. Komarova, Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Economic Theory and Applied Sociology

8 Marta / Narodnoy Voli Str. 62/45, Yekaterinburg 620144, Russian Federation



A. A. Osipenko
Tyumen State University
Russian Federation

Alexey A. Osipenko, Рostgraduate at the Philosophy

6 Volodarsky Str., Tyumen 625003, Russian Federation



References

1. Potapov V.P. Moral and Educational Potential of Art in the Process of Spiritual Formation of Youth: Sociological Aspect. Ekonomika. Pravo. Obshchestvo = Economics. Law. Society. 2016;(2):20‒30. (In Russ.)

2. Shaidovskaya M.M. Social Functions of Art in Traditional and Modern Societies. Gumanitarii Yuga Rossii = Humanitarian of the South of Russia. 2024;13(3):100–109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18522/2227-8656.2024.3.8

3. Kazakova M.V. Cultural and Creative Industries: The Boundaries of the Concepts. Kreativnaya ekonomika = Creative Economy. 2020;14(11);2875–2898. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18334/ ce.14.11.111156

4. Ten V.H. Digital Art in the Formation of Youth Values: Historical Aspects of the Problem. Kul'turno-antropologicheskie issledovaniya = Cultural and Anthropological Research. 2023;(2):16–21. (In Russ.)

5. Ryndina A.S. The origins of the theory of values in sociology and the directions of its development. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Sotsiologiya = Bulletin of RUDN. Series: Sociology. 2021;21(3):590–609. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2021-21-3-590-609

6. Schwartz S.H. A Theory of Cultural Value Orientations: Explication and Applications. Comparative Sociology. 2006;5:137‒182.

7. Yarkova E.N. Art as a Subject of Cultural Studies (Experience of Methodological Reflection). Observatoriya kul'tury = Observatory of Culture. 2015;(3):12‒19. (In Russ.)

8. Koroleva L.A. Digital Evolution of Art: Socio-Cultural Analysis in the Contexts of Postmodern Philosophy and Culture. Kul'tura i tekhnologii = Culture and Technology. 2018;3(1-2):20‒28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17586/2587-800X-2018-3-1-2-20-28

9. Barabanov E. Art in the Market or the Market of Art? Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal = Art Magazine. 2002;(46). (In Russ.) Available at: https://moscowartmagazine.com/issue/96/article/2135 (accessed 25.11.2025).

10. Rodner V., Thomson E. The art machine: dynamics of a value generating mechanism for contemporary art. Arts Marketing: An International Journal. 2013;3(4):58‒72. https://doi.org/10.1108/20442081311327165

11. Klamer A. The Value of Culture: On the Relationship between Economics and Arts. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press; 1997. 245 p.

12. Popper F. Art of The Electronic Age. New York: Harry N. Abrams; 1993. 192 p. 13. Grigoriev A. D., Zakharenko T. Yu. Development of Concepts of Digital Art. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Orenburg State University. 2015;(5):11‒17. (In Russ.)

13. Denikin A.A. Post-Digital Aesthetics in Digital Art Practices. Observatoriya kul'tury = Observatory of Culture. 2017;14(1):36‒45. (In Russ.)

14. Costa M. Art Inside Technology Italian Philosophy of Technology. In: Chiodo S., Schiaffonati V. (eds.) Philosophy of Engineering and Technology. Vol. 35. Cham: Springer; 2021. P. 218‒282. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54522-2_14

15. Lavrentyeva E.A. Digital Art as a New Artistic Communication System // Decorative Art and the Object-Spatial Environment. Vestnik RGGPU im. S. G. Stroganova = Bulletin of the Stroganov Russian State University of Art and Industry. 2020;(3-2):191‒202. (In Russ.)

16. Nagornaya L.N. The Communicative Potential of Digital Art: Cultural and Historical Paradigms and Practices. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstv = Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Culture and Arts. 2024;(5):76–84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/1997–0803-2024-5121-76-84

17. Bramantyo T. Digital Art and the Future of Traditional Arts. Journal of Musicological Research. 2021;1:96‒110. https://doi.org/10.33779/2587-6341.2021.1.096-110

18. Cajulis R., Tuazon J., Cabauatan R. Artificial Intelligence in Digital Art: A Comparative Analysis on Impacts to Artists. International Journal of Arts, Recreation and Sports. 2025;4:1‒27. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijars.2444

19. Раш M. New Media in Art. Moscow: Ad Marginem; 2022. 256 p. (In Russ.)

20. Saburov E. Synthetic Art in a Gaming Society. Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal = Art Magazine. 2002;(46). Available at: https://moscowartmagazine.com/issue/96/article/2130 (accessed 25.06.2025).

21. Zhai W. Innovation and Research of Digital Artwork Design Based on Big Data and Integrated Media. Journal of Function Spaces. 2022;(2):1‒10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6333688

22. Chen J. The Role of AI: Speculative Design in Redefining Artistic Collaboration. Journal of Ecohumanism. 2024;3(8):2261‒2272. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.4899

23. Tillayeva G. The Impact of Digitalization on Cultural Practices and Values. International Journal of Law and Policy. 2025;3:1‒21. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.263

24. Dudkina A.V. Traditional Values of Russian Society in the Digital Age. Gumanitarnyi vektor = Humanitarian Vector. 2022;17(4):83–92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21209/1996–7853-2022-17-4-83-92


Review

For citations:


Popov E.V., Komarova O.V., Osipenko A.A. Digital art as a mechanism for preserving traditional values. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2026;16(1):270-281. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2026-16-1-270-281

Views: 95

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-1552 (Print)