Economic Security Threat Profile Region: Compilation Algorithm and Goals Practical Application

Relevance. The article deals with the theoretical and practical aspects of drawing up a profile of threats to the economic security of the region based on the threat systematization map and the threat priority map.
The purpose of the study is to develop tools for assessing threats to the economic security of the territory, considering the relationship with strategic development priorities on the basis of a modernized method that reflects the quantitative assessment of threats, expert assessment of their importance, and diagnostics of economic security challenges.
The objectives of the study are to clarify the conceptual framework in the field of ensuring the economic security of regional economic systems based on basic provisions, as well as to develop the main stages of analytical research of threats to economic security in order to assess the quality and rapid response of authorities to the processes of economic destabilization.
Methodology. The research was based on theoretical studies and practical developments of domestic economists and practitioners on this issue, which allowed us to conduct a comparative analysis of methods for assessing threats to economic security and to propose an author's approach that is characterized by versatility and ease of use. The writing of the article was accompanied using a wide arsenal of research methods: methods of scoring, the method of the profile of the environment, synthesis, coefficient, tabular, the method of expert evaluation, etc.
Results. The interpretation of the category of "Economic security" in relation to regional development is clarified, and the author's formulation of the concept of "threats to the economic security of the region" is presented. The main provisions of the proposed methodological approach to the analysis of threats to regional economic security are outlined, as well as the existing classification of threats is supplemented. Based on the modernized method of the environment profile, the algorithm of drawing up the profile of the threat to the economic security of the region is proposed, considering its importance for strategic development priorities, the probability of its implementation and elimination at the expense of regional reserves.
Conclusions. Currently, due to the lack of a clear tool for identifying, systematizing, and comprehensively assessing threats to the economic security of the region, the presented research materials can be used in the practical activities of the authorities to develop and justify a set of measures aimed at neutralizing them or reducing the consequences for the economic system of the region.

1. Afontsev S. A. Problemy ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti Rossii v kontekste rynochnoi transformatsii [Problems of economic security of Russia in the context of market transformation]. Available at: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/020/665/1219/001.AFONTSEV.pdf. (accessed 12.02.2021)

2. Plotnikov V. A., Uskova K. L. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' Rossii i razvitie Evraziiskoi integratsii [Economic security of Russia and the development of Eurasian integration]. Teoriya i praktika servisa: ekonomika, sotsial'naya sfera, tekhnologii = Theory and Practice of the Service: Economy, Social Sphere, Technology, 2018, no. 1(35), pp. 5-10.

3. Sigov V. I., Pesotsky A. A. Bezopasnost' ekonomicheskogo prostranstva regiona: kontseptual'nye osnovy i sistema pokazatelei [Security of the economic space of the region: conceptual foundations and a system of indicators]. Ekonomika regiona = The Economy of the Region, 2017, vol. 13, is. 4, pp. 1236-1250.

4. Kharlamov A. V. Transformatsiya khozyaistvennoi sistemy i obespechenie ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti [Transformation of the economic system and ensuring economic security]. Peterburgskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = St. Petersburg Economic Journal, 2020, no. 3, pp. 6-14.

5. Drobot E. V. Issledovanie ekonomicheskogo potentsiala Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza: faktory konkurentosposobnosti i ugrozy ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti [Research of the economic potential of the Eurasian Economic Union: factors of competitiveness and threats to economic security]. Rossiiskoe predprinimatel'stvo = Russian Entrepreneurship, 2016, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1407-1428.

6. Kulagina N. A. Ugrozy ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti: podkhody k vyyavleniyu i metodologiya analiza [Threats to economic security: approaches to identification and methodology of analysis]. European Social Science Journal, 2015, no. 4, pp. 55-58.

7. Mityakov E. S., Mityakov S. N. Otsenka riskov v zadachakh monitoringa ugroz ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti [Risk assessment in the tasks of monitoring threats to economic security]. Trudy Nizhegorodskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta im. R.E. Alekseeva = Proceedings of the Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University named after R. E. Alekseev, 2018, no. 1 (120), pp. 44-51.

8. Kopytov A. V., Makeeva F. S. Sravnitel'nyi analiz metodik otsenki ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti regionov [Comparative analysis of methods for assessing the economic security of regions]. Internetzhurnal "Naukovedenie" = Online Journal "NAUKOVEDENIE", 2014, no. 1(20), p. 17.

9. Kulagina N. A. Otsenka urovnya ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti regiona [Assessment of the level of economic security of the region]. Innovatsii i investitsii = Innovations and Investments, 2011, no. 1, pp. 213-217.

10. O Strategii ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii na period do 2030 goda [On the Strategy of economic Security of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030]. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 13, 2017 № 208. Available at: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71572608/. (accessed 23.03.2021)

11. Golovanov E. B., Bortsova E. V. Metodicheskii podkhod k integral'noi otsenke urovnya ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti gosudarstv [Methodological approach to the integral assessment of the level of economic security of states]. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Economics and Management, 2020, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 58-72.