Preview

Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management

Advanced search

The Impact of Digitalization on the Professional and Educational Activities of the Subjects of the Educational Space of a Modern University

https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2023-13-1-158-168

Abstract

   Relevance. Digitalization processes have fully embraced the Institute of Education. Currently, digitalization is considered as a trend of the Institute of Education. The introduction of digital technologies into the educational space of the university has a significant impact on the interaction of its subjects – teaching staff, students, university administration.
   The purpose is study the impact of digitalization on the subjects of the educational space of a modern university. The leading actors of the educational space were identified as subjects – pedagogical and administrative workers, students.
   The objectives of the study were to diagnose the attitude of the subjects of the educational space of a modern university to the processes of digitalization, to study their opinions on the impact of digital technologies on the educational process, to identify the problems faced by actors in the course of their professional and educational activities, as well as to substantiate the need to improve the regulation of the processes of digital development of universities.
   Methodology. The theoretical basis of the research was the work of M. Castells, E. Toffler, M. Aletta, A. Lipitz, D. Harvey, E. Giddens, Y. Habermas, V. F. Nitsevich, N. V. Noskova, M. S. Yakushkina. The empirical basis was the results of a study of the difficulties of the educational process (by E. V. Konishchev) conducted in 2020 in higher educational institutions of Kursk, Belgorod, Moscow, during the 1st and 2nd waves of the coronavirus pandemic, (N = 1229).
  Results. The study found that the attitude of the subjects of the educational space to the introduction of digital technologies in the educational process is contradictory: respondents believed that digital technologies are a source of difficulties, while others are a resource for innovative development.
   Conclusions. The process of development of digital technologies in the education system requires comprehensive regulation, taking into account the interests of all actors of the educational space and the requirements for the organization of the educational process.

About the Authors

T. N. Kameneva
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Tatyana N. Kameneva, Dr. of Sci. (Sociology), Professor, Department of Sociology 

49/2 Leningradsky Ave., Moscow 125167 



E. V. Konishcheva
Kursk State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Evgeniya V. Konishcheva, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Pedagogy

3 K. Marx Str., Kursk 305004 



I. N. Vasilyeva
Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Russian Federation

Irina N. Vasilyeva, Cand. of Sci. (Sociology), Deputy Head of the Department of Organization of Internal Affairs Bodies, Center for Command and Staff Exercises 

 8 Zoya and Alexander Kosmodemyanskikh Str., Moscow 125993 



References

1. Kastel's M. Informatsionnaya ehpokha: ehkonomika, obshchestvo i kul'tura [Information epoch: economy, society and culture]; ed. by O. I. Shkaratana. Moscow, Higher School of Economics Publ., 2000. 608 p.

2. Toffler Eh. Tret'ya volna [The Third wave]. Moscow, ACT Publ., 2004, pp. 6‒261.

3. Aglietta M. A theory of Capitalist Regulation. London, New Left Books Publ., 1979. 390 p.

4. Harvey D. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford, Blackwell Publishers, 1989. 378 p.

5. Giddens A. Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Cambridge, Polity Press, 1987. 310 p.

6. Habermas J. Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MiT Press, 1989. 301 p.

7. Nitsevich V. F. Tsifrovaya sotsiologiya: teoretiko-metodologicheskie istoki i osnovaniya [Digital sociology: theoretical and methodological origins and foundations]. Tsifrovaya sotsiologiya = Digital Sociology, 2018, no. 1, pp. 18‒27.

8. Sapronov А. V., Abramov A. P. Sotsial'naya polyarizatsiya rossiyskogo obshchestva: dinamika neravenstva [Social polarization of russian society: the dynamics of inequality]. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika, Sotsiologiya. Menedzhment = Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics, Sociology and Managment, 2017, vol. 7, no. 3(24), pp. 185–192.

9. Noskova A. V. [The turn to digital education: how the pandemic changed the high school]. Chelovek i ego sotsial'naya zhizn' v ozhidanii kontsa pandemii: k 30-letiyu fakul'teta sotsiologii RGSU. Materialy XXVI sotsiologicheskikh chtenii, Moskva, 08 aprelya 2021 goda [Man and his social life in anticipation of the end of the pandemic: to the 30th anniversary of the Faculty of Sociology of the Russian State Pedagogical University. Materials of XXVI Sociological readings, Moscow, April 08, 2021]. Moscow, Russian State Social University Publ., 2021, pp. 51‒54. (In Russ.) EDN YATTNU

10. Noskova A. V., Goloukhova D. V., Kuz'mina E. I., Galitskaya D. V. Tsifrovye kompetentsii prepodavatelei v sisteme akademicheskogo razvitiya vysshei shkoly: opyt ehmpiricheskogo issledovaniya [Digital competencies of teachers in the system of academic development of higher schools: the experience of empirical research]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia, 2022, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 159‒168. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-1-159-168. EDN EAKBIR

11. Eichhorn M. Fit für die digitale Hochschule? Modellierung und Erfassung digitaler Kompetenzen von Hochschullehren. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie Und Praxis der Medienbildung, 2019, no. 36, pp. 63 –80. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/36/2019.11.13.X

12. Bukhtiyarova I. N. Informatsionnye tekhnologii kak faktor razvitiya sovremennogo inklyuzivnogo obshchestva [Information technologies as a factor in the development of a modern inclusive society]. Gumanitarnye, sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki = Humanities, Socio-Economic and Social Sciences, 2015, no. 6–1, pp. 122–125.

13. Uvarov A. Yu., Van S., Kan Ts., eds. Problemy i perspektivy tsifrovoi transformatsii obrazovaniya v Rossii i Kitae. II Rossiisko-kitaiskaya konferentsiya issledovatelei obrazovaniya "Tsifrovaya trans-formatsiya obrazovaniya i iskusstvennyi intellekt". Moskva, Rossiya, 26–27 sentyabrya 2019 g. [Problems and prospects of digital transformation of education in Russia and China. II Russian-Chinese Conference of Educational Researchers "Digital Transformation of Education and Artificial Intelligence". Moscow, Russia, September 26-27, 2019]; ed. by I. V. Dvoretskaya. Moscow, Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2019. 155 p.

14. Minina V. N. Tsifrovizatsiya vysshego obrazovaniya i ee sotsial'nyi rezul'taty [Digitalization of higher education and its social results]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Sotsiologiya = Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Sociology, 2020, vol. 13, is. 1, pp. 84‒101.

15. Ridings B. Universitet v ruinakh [University in Ruins]. Moscow, Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2021. 304 p.

16. Brovkina A. A. Spetsifika sub"ekta obrazovatel'nogo protsessa v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii obshchestva [The specifics of the subject of the educational process in the conditions of the digitalization of society]. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk = International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences, 2020, no. 7-2, pp. 68‒72.

17. Shendrik I. G. Teoreticheskie osnovy proektirovaniya obrazovatel'nogo prostranstva sub"ekta [Theoretical foundations of designing the educational space of the subject]. Ekaterinburg, Publishing House of the Russian State Professional Pedagogical University, 2006. 197 p.

18. Kolesnikova I. A. Pedagogicheskaya real'nost': opyt mezhparadigmal'noi refleksii [Pedagogical reality: the experience of inter-paradigm reflection]. St. Petersburg, Detstvo-press Publ., 2001. 288 p.

19. Yakushkina M. S. Obrazovatel'naya sreda i obrazovatel'noe prostranstvo kak ponyatiya sovremennoi pedagogicheskoi nauki [Educational environment and educational space as a concept of modern pedagogical science]. Chelovek i obrazovanie = Man and Education, 2013, no. 2 (35), pp. 66‒69.

20. Vavilova I. N. Teoreticheskoe obosnovanie razvitiya lichnosti [Theoretical substantiation of personality development]. Nauka i shkola = Science and School, 2013, no. 3, pp. 148‒149.

21. Kameneva T. N., Konishcheva E. V. [Difficulties of professional activity of young university teachers]. Gosudarstvennaya molodezhnaya politika: natsional'nye proekty 2019 – 2024 gg. v sotsial'nom razvitii molodezhi. Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Moskva, 20–21 aprelya 2020 goda) [State youth policy: national projects 2019-2024 in the social development of youth. Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and practical conference (Moscow, April 20-21, 2020)]; ed. by T. K. Rostovskaya. Moscow, Perspektiva Publ., 2020. 531 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Kameneva T.N., Konishcheva E.V., Vasilyeva I.N. The Impact of Digitalization on the Professional and Educational Activities of the Subjects of the Educational Space of a Modern University. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2023;13(1):158-168. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2023-13-1-158-168

Views: 592


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-1552 (Print)