Preview

Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management

Advanced search

Role of Chaos and Uncertainty of Theories of Management of Social and Economic Processes

https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2021-11-6-51-64

Abstract

The relevance of the presented article is due to the complexity and ambiguity of the course of reforms in Russia associated with the modernization of previous economic relations, systems, structures, institutions and their replacement by new ones, adequate to the challenges and threats to the sustainable economic development of the country in the context of globalization, political contradictions, sanctions from Western countries. One of the reasons for the failure of the ongoing economic transformations in the country is the removal of the state from participation in the financing of the real economy and the regulation of socio-economic processes. A new direction is being developed in management theory, the peculiarity of which is based on the use of chaos theory to analyze the dynamics of management processes.
The aim of the research. the identification and awareness of the mechanics of chaos development will allow us to predict the likelihood of its approach, and therefore, to identify the causes and to prevent negative manifestations.
Objectives. To identify the main trends in managerial processes and consider scenarios of possible development based on knowledge of the forms of managerial relationships, and to develop science-based recommendations for improving the management system.
Metodology. In the conducted research the methods of comparative analysis, expert assessments, as well as methods of fuzzy logic and dynamic programming were used, which allowed to solve the tasks.
Results. Decision-making associated with the management of the system as a whole, or its units, goals, objectives, conditions of control actions, as well as criteria for assessing the level of achievement of the goals are largely subjective and have a probabilistic basis. This generates fuzzy relations, probabilistic values, which over time leads to a change in the properties, goals and objectives facing the system.
Conclusions. In order to achieve a goal in the process of solving management problems, it is often necessary to make major structural, personnel changes and financial investments, and the decisions made must take into account the possibility of achieving the strategic objectives facing the country, region or industry.

About the Authors

L. V. Shmaneva
Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation named after V. Y. Kikot
Russian Federation

Liudmila V. Shmaneva, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Deputy Chief for Distance Education

Researcher ID: AAY-8472-2020

12 Academika Volgina str., Moscow 117997



S. V. Shmanev
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Sergey V. Shmanev, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Department of Economic Theory

Researcher ID: A-5585-2016

41 Leningradskii prospect, Moscow 125993



References

1. Averkin A. N., Batyrshin I. Z., Blishun A. F., Silov V. B., Tarasov V. B. Nechetkie mnozhestva v modelyah upravleniya i iskusstvennogo intellekta [Fuzzy sets in control and artificial intelligence models]; ed. by D. A. Pospelov. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1986. 311 p.

2. Vihanskij O. S. Strategicheskoe upravlenie [Strategic management]. 2th ed. Moscow, Gardarika Publ., 1998. 296 p.

3. Fajol' A. Obshchee i promyshlennoe upravlenie [General and industrial management]. Moscow, Central'nyj institut truda Publ., 1923. 122 p.

4. Tinbergen Y. A. Ispol'zovanie modelej v ekonomike: opyt i perspektivy: Nobelevskaya lekciya [Using models in economics: experience and prospects: Nobel Lecture]. Nobelevskie laureaty po ekonomike: vzglyad iz Rossii = Nobel Laureates in Economics: A View from Russia. St. Petersburg, Gumanistika Publ., 2003, pp. 34–45.

5. Shumpeter J. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya (Issledovanie predprinimatel'skoj pribyli, kapitala, kredita, procenta i cikla kon"yunktury) [Theory of economic development (Research of entrepreneurial profit, capital, credit, interest and the cycle of conjuncture)]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1982. 455 p.

6. Shmanev S. V. Metodologiya upravleniya investiciyami v promyshlennosti: sinergetikoinstitucional'nyj podhod. Diss. dokt. ekon. nauk [Methodology of investment management in industry: synergetic-institutional approach. Diss. dr. econ. sci]. Moscow, 2007. 288 p.

7. Shvaib D. N. Evolyuciya institucional'nyh uslovii obespecheniya social'no-ekonomicheskoj zashchishchennosti [Evolution of institutional conditions for ensuring socio-economic security]. Byulleten' nauki i praktiki = Bulletin of Science and practice, 2018, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 248–256.

8. Shumpeter J. Kapitalizm, socializm i demokratiya [Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 1995. 540 p. (Ekonomicheskoe nasledie).

9. Shmanev S. V., Nezamajkin V. N., Yurzinova I. L. Sovershenstvovanie sistemy nauchnogo i ekspertno-analiticheskogo obespecheniya strategicheskogo upravleniya, planirovaniya i proektirovaniya [Improving the system of scientific and expert-analytical support for strategic management, planning and design]. Vestnik OrelGIET = Bulletin of OrelGIET, 2015, no. 4(34), p. 44.

10. Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Poryadok iz haosa. Novyj dialog cheloveka s prirodoj (Sinergetika ot proshlogo k budushchemu) [Order from chaos. A new dialogue between man and nature (Synergetics from the past to the future)]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2003. 312 p.

11. Trubeckov D. I. Vvedenie v sinergetiku. Haos i struktury [Introduction to synergetics. Chaos and structures]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2004. 235 p.

12. Shmaneva L. V., Shmanev S. V. Effective functioning of institutions as a basis for sustainable economic development. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioral Sciences EPSBS, 2019, vol. 77, pp. 114–119.

13. Errou K. Dzh. Nepolnoe znanie i ekonomicheskij analiz [Incomplete knowledge and economic analysis]. Istoki [Origins]; ed. by Ya. I. Kuz'minov, V. S. Avtonomov, O. I. Anan'in, eds. Moscow, GU VSHE, 2000, is. 4, pp. 10–27.

14. Shmaneva L.V. Sistemy upravleniya organizaciyami: metodologiya, tekhnologiya i metody [Management systems of organizations: methodology, technology and methods]. Moscow, Mosk. Univ. MVD Rossii imeni V. Ya. Kikotya Publ., 2021. 280 p.

15. Shmaneva L. V., Shmanev S. V. Novyj podhod k upravleniyu social'no-ekonomicheskimi preobrazovaniyami v Rossii [A new approach to the management of socio-economic transformations in Russia]. Vestnik ekonomicheskoj bezopasnosti = Bulletin of Economic Security, 2020, no. 5, p. 229.

16. Shugaeva, O. V. Sinergeticheskij podhod k prognozirovaniyu ustojchivogo razvitiya proizvodstvennyh sistem [Synergetic approach to forecasting sustainable development of production systems]. Koncept = Concept, 2014, vol. 20, pp. 4106–4110.

17. Ekonomika, upravlenie, pravo: aktual'nye voprosy i vektory razvitiya. Sbornik statej III Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii [Economics, management, law: topical issues and vectors of development. Collection of articles of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference]; ed. by A. B. Cheremisin. Petrozavodsk, Novaya nauka Publ., 2020. 66 p.

18. Emerson G. 12 principov proizvoditel'nosti [12 principles of productivity]. 2th ed. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 1992. 220 p.

19. Nedosekin A. O. Primenenie nechetkih mnozhestv v zadachah upravleniya finansami [Application of fuzzy sets in financial management tasks]. Audit i finansovyj analiz = Audit and financial analysis, 2000, no. 2, p. 18.

20. Yanickij O.N. "Perekhod na cifru": nekotorye voprosy teorii i metodologii issledovaniya ["Transition to digital": some questions of theory and methodology of research]. Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya = Russia reforming, 2019, no. 17, pp. 287–307. https://doi.org/10.19181/ezheg.2019.12


Review

For citations:


Shmaneva L.V., Shmanev S.V. Role of Chaos and Uncertainty of Theories of Management of Social and Economic Processes. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2021;11(6):51-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2021-11-6-51-64

Views: 215


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-1552 (Print)