Concepts of Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, Imre Lakatos in the Context of the Economic Paradigm

Relevance. In connection with the decline of neoconservative ideology, methodological disputes have escalated regarding both the methods used by economists and the scientific paradigm underlying economic science itself. If in the XIX century economic analysis corresponded to a critical scientific approach, then in the second half of the XX century economists had to revise the requirements for the quality of research from the standpoint of falsificationism. The article deals with the problems of applying the concepts of K. Popper, I. Lakatosh, etc. Kuhn's approach to the theoretical postulates of the modern economic mainstream, Marxism and institutionalism.

The purpose is to consider the problem of critical application of the concepts of K. Popper, I. Lakatosh and T. Kuhn to modern scientific knowledge and the tasks of current economic research.

Objectives. The following tasks are considered: concretization of the principle of verificationism in relation to economic analysis; concretization of the principle of falsificationism in relation to economic research; determination of the directions of progressive research economic programs.

Methodology. The article is prepared within the framework of the positivist paradigm and an adductive approach combining deductive-inductive logic

Results. Economics is a science from the point of view of the paradigm of Imre Lakatos and Thomas Kuhn, but it is not a sphere of pure scientific knowledge from the standpoint of Karl Popper's falsificationism.

Conclusions. The principle of verificationism dominates modern scientific economic research. Most economic paradigms are degrading. In economic research, it is necessary not only to strive to statistically confirm the hypothesis put forward, but also to compare it with competing scientific explanations.

1. Popper K. Otkrytoe obshchestvo i ego vragi [Open society and its enemies]; ed. by V. N. Sadovskogo. Moscow, Kul'turnaya iniciativa, Feniks Publ., 1992. 528 p.

2. Plutarh. Sravnitel'nye zhizneopisaniya [Comparative biographies]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1994, vol. 1. 702 p.

3. Marshall A. Principy ekonomicheskoj nauki [Principles of economic science]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1993. 414 p.

4. Bekker Garri S. Chelovecheskoe povedenie: ekonomicheskij podhod [Human behavior: an economic approach]. Moscow, Higher School of Economics Publ., 2003. 672 p.

5. Mill' Dzh. Styuart. Principy politicheskoj ekonomii [Principles of Political Economy]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1980, vol. 3. 446 p.

6. Popper K. Logika nauchnogo issledovaniya [Logic of scientific research]. Moscow, ATS, Astrel' Publ., 2010. 565 p.

7. Kun T. Struktura nauchnyh revolyucij [The structure of scientific revolutions]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2009. 310 p.

8. Filosofiya nauki [Philosophy of Science]; ed. by M. A. Rozova. Moscow, Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2004, is. 10. 249 p.

9. Glaz'ev S. Yu. O novoj paradigme v ekonomicheskoj nauke [On a new paradigm in economic science]. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyj vestnik = Public Administration. Electronic Bulletin, 2016, no. 56, pp. 5‒39.

10. Nicholson Walter. Microeconomic theory. Basic principles and extensions. Amherst Center, MA, United States, 2015.

11. Lakatosh I. Fal'sifikaciya i metodologiya nauchno-issledovatel'skih program [Falsification and methodology of research programs]. Moscow, Medium Publ., 1995. 475 p.

12. Marks K. Kapital [Capital]. Available at: https://msrabota.ru/content/book-docs/Marks_k_kapital_Tom_Pervii.a6. (accessed 20.03.2023)

13. Lakatos Imre. Istoriya filosofii [Lakatos Imre History of Philosophy]. Available at: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/. (accessed 14.03.2023)

14. Blaug M. Metodologiya ekonomicheskoj nauki, ili Kak ekonomisty ob"yasnyayut [Methodology of economic science, or How economists explain]. Moscow, Zhurnal Voprosy ekonomiki Publ., 2004. 611 p.

15. Friedman Milton. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago, USA, University of Chicago Publ., 1982. 202 p.

16. Hajek Fridrih Avgust. Pagubnaya samonadeyannost' [Pernicious arrogance]. Moscow, Novosti Publ., 1992. 304 p.

17. Hajek F. Pravo, zakonodatel'stvo i svoboda. Sovremennoe ponimanie liberal'nyh principov spravedlivosti i politiki [Law, legislation and freedom. Modern understanding of liberal principles of justice and politics]. Moscow, Chelyabinsk, Socium Publ., 2020. 645 p.

18. Mizes Lyudvig fon. Byurokratiya. Zaplanirovannyj haos. Antikapitalisticheskaya mental'nost' [Planned chaos. Anti-capitalist mentality]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 1993. 234 p.

19. Jean Hindriks, Gareth D. Myles. Intermediate Public Economics. Massachusetts, USA, MIT Press Publ., 2006. 720 p.

20. Mueller Denis C. Public Choice III. Cambridge, VK, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2003. 747 p.

21. Steindel C. Thomas Piketty: Capital and Ideology. Business Economics, 2020, no. 55, pp. 172‒ 175.

22. Adzhemoglu Daron, Robinson Dzhejms A. Pochemu odni strany bogatye, a drugie bednye. Proiskhozhdenie vlasti, procvetaniya i nishchety [Why some countries are rich and others are poor. The Origin of power, prosperity and poverty]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2015. 692 p.