Fundamentals of Modern Qualitivism
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2022-12-4-264-271
Abstract
Relevance. The article examines the current stage of the development of qualitivism, analyzes the approaches and methodologies associated with it. Research in this field of knowledge does not lose relevance, and moreover is gaining popularity, because now qualitivism is logically "inscribed" in the philosophy of quality that permeates all spheres of human and social life.
The purpose of this study is to study the current stage of the development of qualitivism for further definition of qualitivism in the conditions of the technoscientific revolutions of the new technological order by analyzing the approaches and methodologies associated with it, the teachings of philosophers and the opinions of specialists.
Objectives: identification of parallels between modern and historically developed qualitivism, as well as reflection of the key provisions of the teachings of philosophers that have had the greatest impact on modern qualitivism.
Methodology. The current development of philosophical and methodological knowledge allows us to isolate and explore modern qualitivism not only from the standpoint of quality, but also the concepts of a complex, integral, whole. At the same time, the idea of consistency, which underlies many scientific approaches and research, is defined as a kind of foundation for building a new approach to the study of modern qualitivism from the positions of the leading scientific directions of post-non-classical science and philosophy. Results. The fundamentals of modern qualitivism are studied and presented, correlations between modern and historically established qualitivism are established.
Conclusions. Within the framework of modern qualitivism, technicism, economism, management are applications to a single integral unique concept of "qualitative knowledge", and also the genesis of the concept of quality of life becomes clear, since it reflects society's request for more humanistic criteria for the development of society, close to the level of sensory-empirical existence, everyday life and people's concerns.
About the Author
A. V. Mayakova
Southwest State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna V. Mayakova, Cand. of Sci. (Philosophical), Associate Professor of the Department of International Relations and Public Administration
50 Let Oktyabrya Str. 94, Kursk 305040
References
1. Kvalitativizm [Qualitivism]. Available at: https://iphlib.ru/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASH01a2e376c7712af8c3be65a2. (accessed 07.04.2022)
2. Vizgin V. P. Genezis i struktura kvalitativizma Aristotelya [Genesis and structure of Aristotle's qualitivism]. 2th ed. Moscow, Centr gumanitarnyh iniciativ Publ., St. Petersburg, Centr gumanitarnyh iniciativ Publ., 2016. 414 p.
3. Subetto A. I. Sochineniya. Noosferizm [Essays. Noospherism]; ed. by L. A. Zelenova. St. Petersburg, Kostroma, Kostroma State University named after N. A. Nekrasov, 2009. 392 p.
4. Shchekotin E. V. Koncepciya kachestva zhizni v kontekste sovremennogo kvalitativizma [The concept of quality of life in the context of modern qualitivism]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya = Theory and Practice of Social Development, 2020, no. 7 (149), pp. 37-39.
5. Mayakova A. V. Slozhnostnoe kachestvo kak aktual'naya kategoriya postneklassicheskoj filosofii i nauki [Complexity quality as an actual category of postnonclassical philosophy and science]. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki = Philosophy of Science and Technology, 2018, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 116-127.
6. Matronina L. F. [The problem of quality in the context of postnonclassical science]. Aktual'nye problemy sovremennogo innovacionnogo razvitiya. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov [Actual problems of modern innovative development. Collection of scientific papers]; ed. by I. V. Gajdamashko. Moscow, OntoPrint Publ., 2019, pp. 16-24. (In Russ.)
7. Arshinov V. I., Budanov V. G. Fenomen slozhnostnosti i kvantovaya semiotika [The phenomenon of complexity and quantum semiotics]. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philosophy, 2021, no. 12, pp. 67-77.
8. Mayakova A. V. Teoriya slozhnosti kak vysshaya stupen' sinergetiki [Theory of complexity as the highest stage of synergetics]. Aspirantskij vestnik Povolzh'ya = Postgraduate Bulletin of the Volga region, 2016, no. 3-4, pp. 106-112.
9. Stankevich L. P., eds. Princip celostnosti v ponimanii social'noj real'nosti: (aksiologicheskij aspekt) [The principle of integrity in understanding social reality: (axiological aspect)]; ed. by L. P. Stankevicha. Lipeck, Izdatel'stvo Lipetskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta Publ., 2010. 108 p.
10. Aristotel'. Metafizika [Metaphysics]. Moscow, RIPOL klassik Publ., 2018. 384 p.
11. Aseeva I. A., Mayakova A. V. Filosofskie osnovaniya i metodologicheskie resursy novoj paradigmy slozhnosti [Philosophical foundations and methodological resources of the new paradigm of complexity]. Filosofiya i kul'tura = Philosophy and Culture, 2015, no. 8, pp. 1117-1125.
12. Princip celostnosti i nauki o kul'ture. Trudy nauchnogo seminara po celostnosti [The principle of integrity and the science of culture. Proceedings of the scientific seminar on integrity]; ed. by E. G. Sokolova, Yu. N. Solonina. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnyj izdatel'skij centr "Etnosocium" Publ., 2014. 142 p.
13. Arshinov V. I., Budanov V. G. Kvantovo-slozhnostnaya paradigma. Mezhdisciplinarnyj kontekst [Quantum complexity paradigm. Interdisciplinary context]. Kursk, Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 2015. 121 p.
14. Budanov V. G. Metodologiya sinergetiki v postneklassicheskoj nauke i v obrazovanii [Methodology of synergetics in postnonclassical science and education]. Moscow, Izdatel'stvo LKI Publ., 2009. 240 p.
15. Rerih N. K. Izbrannoe [Selected]. Moscow, Sovetskaya Rossiya Publ., 1979. 348 p.
16. Gindilis L. M. Kosmologicheskie zapisi Eleny Ivanovny Rerih – osnova nauki budushchego [Elena Ivanovna Roerich's cosmological records – the basis of the science of the future]. Available at: https://roerich-lib.ru/index.php/130-let-so-dnya-rozhdeniya-e-i-rerikh-materialy-konferentsii-mtsr-2009/4987-gindilis-l-m-kosmologicheskie-zapisi-eleny-ivanovny-rerikh-osnova-nauki-budushchego. (accessed 07.04.2022)
17. Il'in I. A. Spasenie v kachestve [Salvation as]. Russkij kolokol = Russian Bell, 1928, no. 4, pp. 3-7.
18. Subetto A. I. Koncepciya kachestva N. K. Reriha [Roerich's concept of quality]. Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie = Society. Wednesday. Development, 2015, no. 1, pp. 43–48.
19. Subetto A. I. Svoboda. Kniga pervaya. Kritika "liberal'nogo razuma" [Svoboda. The first book. Criticism of the "liberal mind"]. Kostroma, Kostroma State University named after N. A. Nekrasov Publ., 2008. 238 p.
20. Holton Dzh. Chto takoe "antinauka"? [What is "anti-science"?]. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philosophy, 1992, no. 2, pp. 26–58.
Review
For citations:
Mayakova A.V. Fundamentals of Modern Qualitivism. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2022;12(4):264-271. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2022-12-4-264-271
Views:
118
Email this article 