Preview

Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management

Advanced search

The Triple Helix Model as a Tool for the Economic Development of the Country on the Example of the Military-Industrial Complex of the Russian Federation

https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2023-13-6-243-254

Abstract

   Relevance. The "state-science-business" model has firmly entered the practical sphere of human and social life as a signifier of many socio-economic processes. It is a systematic integrated approach to the consideration of problems exclusively applied areas that will allow them to be solved in the most effective way and in the shortest possible time. The economic sphere has always been considered by the state as one of the priorities, since a steadily developing economy provides ample opportunities for the development of civil society. Over the past few years, the President and the Government of Russia have outlined clear guidelines for the development of the economy, one of which is the modernization of the industrial complex of the state through the inclusion of the state and scientific and technological block in the industrial system.

   The purpose of this study is to review and analyze the model of interaction "state – science – business" within the framework of Russia's economic development and the long-term plans established by the President of the Russian Federation concerning the modernization of the industrial complex.

   Objectives: to analyze the international experience of the development of the industrial complex; to consider the features of the formation and functioning of the domestic industrial complex; to study the current state and assess the prospects for the development of the economy and production on the example of the military-industrial complex of Russia.

   Methodology. The study was carried out on the basis of the general provisions of the system theory and interinstitutional and transinstitutional communication using the system-structural method.

   Results. In the conditions of the established priorities of economic development at the highest level, it is necessary to: develop internal and external R&D; generate the creation of a new type of university, the ecosystem of which moderates ideas and projects requested by society and the state, releasing them into the real sector of the economy for production and economic development; introduce the university (science) into the business community; form engineering andscientific personnel potential.

   Conclusions. For the economic development of the country, it is necessary to strengthen the "state-science-business" relationships not only from the perspective of the industrial complex, but also scientific and educational platforms, including through the development of external R&D and their opening on the basis of higher educational institutions.

About the Authors

E. G. Kamensky
Southwest State University
Russian Federation

Evgeny G. Kamensky, Dr. of Sci. (Philosophy), Associate Professor

Department of Philosophy and Sociology

305040

50 Let Oktyabrya Str. 94

Kursk



A. V. Mayakova
Southwest State University
Russian Federation

Anna V. Mayakova, Cand. of Sci. (Philosophy), Associate Professor

Department of International Relations and Public Administration

305040

50 Let Oktyabrya Str. 94

Kursk



A. Y. Ogurtsova
Southwest State University
Russian Federation

Albina Y. Ogurtsova, Post-Graduate Student

Department of a Constitutional Law

305040

50 Let Oktyabrya Str. 94

Kursk



M. A. Huseynov
Southwest State University
Russian Federation

Maksim A. Huseynov, Post-Graduate Student

Department of Philosophy and Sociology

305040

50 Let Oktyabrya Str. 94

Kursk



References

1. Doklad Prezidenta Rossijskoj Federacii V. V. Putina na zasedanii Prezidiuma Gosudarstvennogo Soveta 04 aprelya 2023 goda [Report of the President of the Russian Federation V. V. Putin at the meeting of the Presidium of the State Council on April 04, 2023]. Prezidenta Rossii [President of Russia]. Available at: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/70860 (accessed 27. 09. 2023)

2. Oficial'naya statistika: promyshlennoe proizvodstvo [Official statistics: industrial production]. Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoj statistiki [Federal State Statistics Service]. Available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/enterprise_industrial (accessed 27. 09. 2023)

3. Bondarenko N. E., Dubovik M. V., Gubarev R. V. "Trojnaya spiral'" kak osnova sozdaniya innovacionnyh sistem ["Triple helix" as the basis for creating innovative systems]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta im. G. V. Plekhanova = Bulletin of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 2018, vol. 2, no. 98, pp. 3‒15.

4. Bajmuratov U. B., Zhanbaev R. A., Sagintaeva S. S. Model' trojnoj spirali v formirovanii konceptual'nogo mekhanizma vzaimodejstviya vysshego obrazovaniya i biznesa: regional'nyj aspekt [The triple helix model in the formation of the conceptual mechanism of interaction between higher education and business: a regional aspect]. Ekonomika regiona = The Economy of the Region, 2020. vol. 16, is. 4, pp. 1046‒1060.

5. Burdakova G. I., Byankin A. S., Vahrusheva V. O. Razvitie tekhnologicheskogo predprinimatel'stva v regione na osnove modeli "trojnoj spirali" [Development of technological entrepreneurship in the region based on the "triple helix" model]. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie nauki = Scientific and Technical Bulletin of St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University. Economic Sciences, 2017, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 172‒181.

6. Petrov V. V. "Treugol'nik Lavrent'eva" v koncepcii "Trojnoj spirali" innovacionnogo razvitiya ["Lavrentiev's triangle" in the concept of the "Triple spiral" of innovative development]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya = Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy, 2015, vol. 13, is. 3, pp. 56–62.

7. Kiyashchenko L. P. Trojnaya spiral' transdisciplinarnosti v obshchestve znanij [The triple spiral of transdisciplinarity in the society of knowledge]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umeniya = Knowledge. Understanding. Skills, 2010, no. 3, pp. 67–74.

8. Suslova T. I. Koncepciya "trojnoj spirali" v obrazovanii kak uslovie razvitiya potenciala lichnosti [The concept of the "triple helix" in education as a condition for the development of personality potential]. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya = Successes of Modern Natural Science, 2014, no. 3, pp. 187‒189.

9. Zasedanie Pravitel'stva RF ot 23 avgusta 2023 goda [Meeting of the Government of the Russian Federation on August 23, 2023]. Pravitel'stvo Rossii [Government of Russia]. Available at: http://government.ru/news/49324/ (accessed 27. 09. 2023)

10. D. Manturov dolozhil Putinu o roste obrabatyvayushchej promyshlennosti na 6,2 % [D. Manturov reported to Putin on the growth of the manufacturing industry by 6.2 %]. Izvestiya [Proceedings]. Available at: https://iz.ru/1594265/2023-10-24/putin-provel-rabochuiu-vstrechu-s-manturovym (accessed 27. 09. 2023)

11. Doklad Denisa Manturova o Cvodnoj ctrategii razvitiya obrabatyvayushchej promyshlennosti [Denis Manturov's report on the Consolidated Strategy for the development of the manufacturing industry]. Pravitel'stvo Rossii [The Russian government]. Available at: http://government.ru/news/49324/ (accessed 27. 09. 2023)

12. Luman N. Istina, znanie, nauka kak sistema [Truth, knowledge, science as a system]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2016. 408 p.

13. Luman N. Obshchestvo kak social'naya Sistema [Society as a social system]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2004. 236 p.

14. Habermas Yu. Teoriya kommunikativnogo dejstviya [Theory of communicative action]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya = Bulletin of the Moscow University. Episode 7: Philosophy, 2007, no. 4, pp. 43‒63.

15. Gross domestic spending on R&D. OECD. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/ (accessed 09. 09. 2023)

16. Titkov I. A. Vremya ekonomicheskih peremen: mezhfirmennaya kooperaciya voenno-promyshlennogo kompleksa i grazhdanskih predpriyatij razlichnyh form sobstvennosti [Time of economic changes: inter-firm cooperation of the military-industrial complex and civilian enterprises of various forms of ownership]. Ekonomika i socium: sovremennye modeli razvitiya = Economics and Society: Modern Models of Development, 2020, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 409‒427.

17. Upravlenie oboronnyh issledovatel'skih proektov SSHA [Office of Defense Research Projects of the USA]. Available at: https://www.facebook.com/DARPA/ (accessed 09. 10. 2023)

18. Kamenskij E. G., Mayakova A. V., Ogurcova A. Yu., Plyakin A. S. Normativnoe i programmnoe obespechenie modeli "trojnoj spirali" [Normative and software support of the "triple helix" model]. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Menedzhment = Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics, Sociology and Management, 2023, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 187‒198.

19. Petrova V. Innovacii so znakom neopredelennosti [Innovations with a sign of uncertainty]. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/6250698?ysclid=lnt5ke5k2u304412637 (accessed 17. 09. 2023)

20. SIPRI: mirovye oboronnye raskhody dostigli rekordnoj summy za vosem' let [SIPRI: global defense spending has reached a record amount in eight years]. RIA Novosti [RIA Novosti]. Available at: https://ria.ru/20230424/raskhody-1867244194.html?ysclid=lnt5przuly128557665 (accessed 11. 09. 2023)

21. Murav'eva L. A. Promyshlennoe razvitie i Finansy v gody dovoennyh pyatiletok [Industrial development and Finance in the years of the pre-war five-year plans]. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit, 2003, vol. 9, no. 123, pp. 80‒87.

22. Kalebov I. G., Ryabkov V. M. SSSR i strany mira v cifrah (2008–2023.) Spravochnyj material [The USSR and the countries of the world in numbers (2008-2023). Reference material]. Moscow, MGUKI Publ., 2015. 212 p.

23. Malickij B. A., Zhilyaev I. B. [Comparison of the main characteristics and directions of development of scientific potentials of the USSR and the USA]. Sovremennoe naukovedenie i perestroika sovetskoi nauki. Doklady Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii [Modern Science and the Restructuring of Soviet Science. Reports of the International Conference]. Kiev, 1991. 15 p. (In Russ.)

24. O Natsional'nom tsentre razvitiya tekhnologii i bazovykh elementov robototekhniki [About the National Center for the Development of Technologies and Basic Elements of Robotics]. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of December 16, 2015 № 623. Available at: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001201512160011?index=2&ysclid=lo8f785nvt109228471 (accessed 27. 09. 2023)

25. Osipov A. G., Savinyh V. N., Makarenko N. N. Innopolisy i naukogrady: strategiya nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo proryva i "Chelovecheskij faktor". Interekspo Geo-Sibir' [Innopolises and science cities: the strategy of scientific and technological breakthrough and the "human factor". Interexpo Geo-Siberia]. Novosibirsk, Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technologies, 2019, pp. 93‒97.

26. Mayakova A. V. Shestoj tekhnologicheskij uklad i kachestvo zhizni [The sixth technological way and the quality of life]. Gumanitarnyj vestnik Donskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Humanitarian Bulletin of the Don State Agrarian University, 2022, no. 2, pp. 14‒19.

27. Innovacionnaya deyatel'nost' v Rossijskoj Federacii [Innovative activity in the Russian Federation]. Statistika nauki i obrazovaniya [Statistics of science and education]. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/xqrxtf (accessed 09. 09. 2023)

28. O promyshlennoj politike v Rossijskoj Federacii [On Industrial Policy in the Russian Federation]. Federal Law of December 31, 2014 № 488-FZ (ed. of July 24, 2023). Available at: http://https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_173119/f0ba8a5a24b877008deadaf996dc765232f8c9c8/. (accessed 09. 09. 2023)

29. Efimov V. S., Lapteva A. V. Universitet 4.0: Filosofsko-metodologicheskij analiz [University 4.0: Philosophical and methodological analysis]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis, 2017, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 16‒29.


Review

For citations:


Kamensky E.G., Mayakova A.V., Ogurtsova A.Y., Huseynov M.A. The Triple Helix Model as a Tool for the Economic Development of the Country on the Example of the Military-Industrial Complex of the Russian Federation. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2023;13(6):243-254. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2023-13-6-243-254

Views: 212


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-1552 (Print)