The Crisis of the Sovereign State-Nation and the "Rational Discussion": the Liberal Discourse of the "Salvation" of Democracy and the "Common Good"
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2022-12-1-193-208
Abstract
Relevance. The crisis of the modern European sovereign nation-state is defined as existential (not "technical"); therefore, we should talk about a socio-philosophical study of the "crisis of the foundations".
The purpose of the article is to present the non-reality of the foundations of the nation-state in modern times, totally determined by the dominant liberal economic paradigm of the political (J. Agamben), and modern ways of removing the consequences of the political crisis in the liberal tradition.
The objective is based on the interpretation of these statements - to determine the conditions and boundaries of the possibility of "response" from the perspective of "liberal metaphysics".
Methodology. According to K. Schmitt, liberalism is "consistent metaphysics", the essence of which is defined as "endless free / public discussion"; a consistent liberal "response" to the challenge, therefore, can only be given on the basis of the named "essence" ‒ the main methodological position that determines the structure and content of this article.
Results. It was revealed, that a nation as a form of political unity of a sovereign people, in the perspective of liberal metaphysics, cannot be relied on as a "substance of the state". That the people-sovereign is "split in itself" and the available ways of actualizing its real unity are no longer "valid". That the mechanisms of political representation that democratically legitimize the power institutions of a sovereign nation-state in its new European, that is, liberal, form, need radical reform. "Free discussion", stated in the article, is limited in the possibility of "answering" the "existential crisis"; this presupposes the need to reduce the "political" (Schmitt's "concept of the political" as an "existential solution" of the sovereign in the horizon of the existential opposition "friend – enemy") and "reduction" by means of such a reduction of the "essentially political" to technical issues of "governance" (M. Weber). Three main methods of "liberal reduction of the political" are distinguished: "logical-epistemological" by Y. Elster, "ethical" by J. Rawls, "aesthetic" by R. Ankersmit, and their characteristic "features" are determined.
Conclusion. It is concluded that a consistent liberal political philosophy, losing in its understanding of politics as government, the distinction between auctoritas and potestas, is unable to thematize the "existential", that is, political, crisis of the foundations of a sovereign nation-state.
Keywords
About the Authors
K. G. MaltsevRussian Federation
Konstantin G. Maltsev - Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Theory and Methodology of Science,
46 Kostyukov str., Belgorod 308012
A. V. Maltseva
Russian Federation
Anna V. Maltseva - Candidate of Political Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Theory and Methodology of Science,
46 Kostyukov str., Belgorod 308012
References
1. Schmitt C. Politicheskaya teologiya: chetyre glavy k ucheniyu o suverenitete [Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty.]. Ponyatie politicheskogo [The Concept of the Political]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2016, pp. 5-59.
2. Bauman Z. Globalizatsiya. Posledstviya dlya cheloveka i obshchestva [Globalization. Consequences for individuals and society]. Moscow, Ves Mir Publ., 2004. 188 p.
3. Ankersmit F. R. Esteticheskaya politika. Politicheskaya filosofiya po tu storonu fakta i tsennosti [Aesthetic Politics. Political Philosophy Beyond Fact and Value]. Moscow, The Higher School of Economics Publishing House, 2014. 432 p.
4. Schmitt C. Dukhovno-istoricheskoe sostoyanie sovremennogo parlamentarizma [The Historical and Spiritual State of Modern Parliamentarism]. Ponyatie politicheskogo [The Concept of the Political]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2016, pp. 93-170.
5. Habermas J. Theory of Communicative Action. Boston, Beacon Press, 1984, vol. 1. 465 р.
6. Habermas J. Theory of Communicative Action. A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston, Beacon Press, 1987, vol. 2. 463 р.
7. Rowls J. Political Liberalism. New York, Columbia University Press, 1996. 525 р.
8. Ankersmit F. R. Politicheskaya reprezentatsiya [Political representation]. Moscow, The Higher School of Economics Publishing House, 2012. 288 p.
9. Heidegger M. Osnovnye problemy fenomenologii [Basic problems of phenomenology]. St. Petersburg, Higher Religious and Philosophical School Publ., 2001. 456 p.
10. Alaverdyan A. L., Mal'tsev K. G. "Grazhdanskaya natsiya" i suverennyi narod: issledovanie neobkhodimosti natsional'noi formy politicheskogo edinstva ["Civil nation" and a sovereign people: a study of the need for a national form of political unity]. Gumanitarnye i sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie nauki = Humanities and Socio-Economic Sciences, 2020, no. 5 (114), pp. 24-31.
11. Kaldor M. Novye i starye voiny: Organizovannoe nasilie v global'nuyu epokhu [New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era]. Moscow, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy Publ., 2015. 416 p.
12. Smith A. D. Natsionalizm i modernizm: Kriticheskii obzor sovremennykh teorii natsii i natsionalizma [Ethno-Symbolism and Nationalism: A Cultural Approach]. Moscow, Praksis Publ., 2004. 270 p.
13. Gellner E. Natsii i natsionalizm [Nations and Nationalism]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1991. 320 p.
14. Anderson B. Voobrazhaemye soobshсhestva: Razmyshleniya ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma [Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism]. Moscow, Kanon-Press-Ts Publ., Kuchkovo pole Publ., 2001. 288 p.
15. Lomako L. L., Mal'tsev K. G. Modernistskii i konstruktivistskii sposoby kontseptualizatsii natsii i natsionalizma: sopostavitel'nyi analiz [Modernist and Constructivist Ways of Conceptualizing Nation and Nationalism: Comparative Analysis]. Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya = Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, 2020, no. 3, pp. 273-291.
16. Brubaker R. Etnichnost' bez grupp [Ethnicity without Groups]. Moscow, The Higher School of Economics Publishing House, 2012. 408 p.
17. Lomako L. L., Mal'tsev K. G. Konstruktivistskaya paradigma v issledovanii natsii, natsionalizma, etnonatsional'nogo konflikta: nekotorye kriticheskie zamechaniya [Constructivist paradigm in the study of nation, nationalism, ethno-national conflict: some critical remarks]. Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal = Eurasian Law Journal, 2020, no. 8 (147), pp. 430-434.
18. Mann M. Istochniki sotsial'noi vlasti [Sources of Social Power]. Moscow, Case Publ., 2018, vol. 2, book 1. 1503 p.
19. Hobsbawm E. Natsii i natsionalizm posle 1780 goda [Nations and Nationalism after 1780]. St. Petersburg, Aliteya Publ., 1998. 305 p.
20. Yak B. Natsionalizm i moral'naya psikhologiya soobshchestva [Nationalism and the moral psychology of the community]. Moscow, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy Publ., 2017. 520 p.
21. Hubner K. Natsiya: Ot zabveniya k vozrozhdeniyu [The Nation: From Oblivion to Rebirth]. Moscow, Kanon + Publ., 2001. 400 p.
22. Agamben G. Homo sacer. Suverennaya vlast' i golaya zhizn' [Homo Sacer. Sovereign Power and Bare Life]. Moscow, Evropa Publ., 2011. 256 p.
23. Arendt H. O revolyutsii [On Revolution]. Moscow, Evropa Publ., 2011. 464 p.
24. Baudrillard J. V teni molchalivogo bolshinstva, ili konets sotsialnogo [In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities, or the End of the Social]. Ekaterinburg, Ural University Publ., 2000. 96 p.
25. Baudrillard J. Symbolic exchange and death [Simvolicheskii obmen i smert']. Moscow, Dobrosvet Publ., 2000. 389 p.
26. Lomako L. L., Mal'tsev K. G. Diskurs "antiterroristicheskoi voiny" i spravedlivaya, to est' total'naya, voina [Discourse of "anti-terrorist war" and just, that is, total, war]. PolitBook, 2020, no. 3, pp. 80-97.
27. Schmitt C. Legal'nost' i legitimnost' [Legality and legitimacy]. Gosudarstvo: Pravo i politika. [State: Law and Politics]. Moscow, The Higher School of Economics Publishing House, 2013, рp. 221- 306.
28. Schmitt C. Uchenie o konstitutsii [The Doctrine of the Constitution]. Gosudarstvo i politicheskaya forma [State and Political Form]. Moscow, The Higher School of Economics Publishing House, 2010, pp. 33-236.
29. Hobbes T. Leviafan ili materiya, forma i vlast' gosudarstva tserkovnogo i grazhdanskogo [Leviathan or The Matter, Forme and Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil]. Moscow, Mysl' Publ., 2001. 478 p.
30. Weber M. Khozyaistvo i obshchestvo: ocherki ponimayushchei sotsiologii [Economy and Society: Essays on Interpretive Sociology]. Moscow, The Higher School of Economics Publishing House, 2019, vol. 4. 542 p.
31. Elster J. Kislyi vinograd: issledovanie provalov ratsional'nosti [Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality]. Moscow, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy Publ., 2018. 296 p.
32. Kant I. K vechnomu miru [To the eternal peace]. Sochineniya [Works]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1994, vol. 7, pp. 5-57.
33. Schmitt C. Ponyatie politicheskogo [The Concept of the Political]. Ponyatie politicheskogo [The Concept of the Political]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2016, pp. 280-408.
34. Heidegger M. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics [Kant i problema metafiziki]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 1997. 168 p.
Review
For citations:
Maltsev K.G., Maltseva A.V. The Crisis of the Sovereign State-Nation and the "Rational Discussion": the Liberal Discourse of the "Salvation" of Democracy and the "Common Good". Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2022;12(1):193-208. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2022-12-1-193-208