Development of national economic systems in the context of transformation of globalization and regionalization processes
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2024-14-3-10-24
Abstract
Relevance. In the context of the formation of a multipolar world and the increasing sanctions pressure from unfriendly countries, Russia needs to adjust the models of integration into the system of world economic relations. In this context, an in-depth analysis of the mechanisms of internationalization, globalization and regionalization is required.
The purpose is to consider the peculiarities of the impact of globalization and regionalization processes on national economies, taking into account the transformation of their internationalization models.
Objectives: to consider the concepts of internationalization, regionalization and globalization, to identify their relationship; to identify the advantages and disadvantages of globalization, on the basis of which to describe the directions of transformation of forms of internationalization of economies; based on the analysis of available statistical data, to identify promising areas of integration of the national economy into the system of world economic relations.
Methodology. The methods of quantitative and qualitative analysis, monographic and retrospective analysis, methods of comparing economic phenomena and processes, methods of abstraction, generalization of analyzed economic information are used.
Results. The internationalization of national economies is a long-term sustainable trend. Their development is confirmed by sufficiently convincing quantitative data. Recently, the dynamics of the corresponding time series has become unstable, volatile and turbulent, with a tendency to decrease the level of indicators. There are transformations of the processes of globalization and regionalization, they acquire not only a new quality, but also institutional consolidation.
Conclusions. The traditional model of globalization has exhausted itself. Due to the formation of a multipolar political and economic global space, in addition to the "center" and "periphery", countries of the "semi-periphery" stand out in it. They have sufficient economic sovereignty to refuse to participate in globalization projects, the balance of effects of which for these countries becomes negative. Russia is one of these countries. An additional incentive for reconfiguring the Russian model of internationalization of the economy is the anti-Russian sanctions imposed by the countries of the "center". In this regard, it is necessary to open up new opportunities for the national economy to integrate into the global economic space based on models of regionalization and glocalization.
About the Authors
V. A. PlotnikovRussian Federation
Vladimir A. Plotnikov, Doctor of Scienses (Economics), Professor, Professor of the Department of General Economic Theory
30-32 Griboedov canal Emb., St. Petersburg 191023
S. N. Pshenichnikova
Russian Federation
Svetlana N. Pshenichnikova, Doctor of Scienses (Economics), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of General Economic Theory
30-32 Griboedov canal Emb., St. Petersburg 191023
V. A. Fedotov
Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Fedotov, Post-Graduate Student of the Department of General Economic Theory
30-32 Griboedov canal Emb., St. Petersburg 191023
References
1. Maksimtsev I.A., Mezhevich N.M., Razumovskii V.M. The global economy facing the challenges of «annus horribilis»: on the threshold of a new regionalization. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta = Proceedings of the St. Petersburg State University of Economics. 2017;(1-2):19-24. (In Russ.)
2. Plotnikova O.V., Dubrovina O.Yu. Globalization and regionalization, their impact on international cooperation of regions. Vlast' = Power. 2013;(2):134-136. (In Russ.)
3. Rushkova A.V., Vertakova Yu.V. Analysis of the impact of the level of globalization of a country on its sectoral structure. Aktual'nye napravleniya nauchnykh issledovanii XXI veka: teoriya i praktika = Actual Directions of Scientific Research of the XXI Century: Theory and Practice. 2016;4(6):181-189. (In Russ.)
4. Kharlamov A.V. Russia and the globalization of the world economy. Izvestiya SanktPeterburgskogo universiteta ekonomiki i finansov = Proceedings of the St. Petersburg University of Economics and Finance. 2002;(4):60-70. (In Russ.)
5. Panfilova O.V. Equitable distribution and consumption in the context of globalization of the reproductive process. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta = Proceedings of the St. Petersburg State University of Economics. 2018;(3):22-28. (In Russ.)
6. Plotnikov V.A. Transnational value chains and global pricing mechanisms: a theorist's view. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta = Proceedings of the St. Petersburg State University of Economics. 2022;(2):7-13. (In Russ.)
7. Prokhorenko I. New regionalism: the problem of configuration of the modern world order. Puti k miru i bezopasnosti = Paths to Peace and Security. 2015;(2):20-28. (In Russ.)
8. Malysheva D.B., Khoros V.G. (eds.) «The Third World»: half a century later. Moscow: IMEMO RAN; 2013. 262 p. (In Russ.)
9. Grinin L.E. National sovereignty and the processes of globalization (introductory remarks). Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya = Polis. Political Research. 2008;(1):123-133. (In Russ.)
10. Ignat'ev V.I. Social localities in the era of information and network globalization. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Research. 2020;(7):37-46. (In Russ.)
11. Plotnikov V.A. Synchronization of technological, social and economic transformations in the conditions of «island» transformation. Noonomika i nooobshchestvo. Al'manakh trudov INIR im. S. Yu. Vitte = Noonomics and the Noo Community. The Almanac of the Works of the INIR named after S. Y. Witte. 2022;1(3):112-123. (In Russ.)
12. Delyagina M.G. (ed.) The practice of globalization: games and rules of a new era. Moscow: Infra-M; 2000. 344 p. (In Russ.)
13. Hannequart A. Economic and Social Cohesion in Europe. A new objective for integration. L.: Routledge; 1992. 236 p.
14. Peck J., Tickell A. Searching for a new institutional fix: the after-Fordist crises and the globallocal disorder. In: Amin A. (ed.). Post-Fordism: a Reader. Oxford; 1994. P. 280-315.
15. Toiganbaeva A.E., Kenzhebaeva Z.S. Methodological foundations of globalization in the development of world trade. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya = Fundamental Research. 2012;(3):193-198. (In Russ.)
16. Syaotsin Ch. High-level Forum. Sankt-Peterburgskie vedomosti = St. Petersburg Vedomosti. 2023;(194):8. (In Russ.)
17. Prebish R. Peripheral capitalism: is there an alternative to it? Moscow: ILA RAS; 1992. 337 p. (In Russ.)
18. Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I., Barashkova O.V. Classical political economy: a modern Marxist trend. Moscow: URSS; 2022. 560 p. (In Russ.)
19. Buzgalin A.V. Globalization of RESISTANCE: struggle in the world. Moscow: URSS; 2009. 304 p. (In Russ.)
20. Zagashvili V. Economic globalization and regional integration in the post-Soviet era. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations. 2022;66(4):5-13. (In Russ.)
21. Dzarasov R.S., Novozhenov D.V. Big business and capital accumulation in modern Russia. Moscow: URSS; 2005. 510 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Plotnikov V.A., Pshenichnikova S.N., Fedotov V.A. Development of national economic systems in the context of transformation of globalization and regionalization processes. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2024;14(3):10-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2024-14-3-10-24