Parametric features of financial and investment models of social security: methodological aspect

Relevance. Global challenges facing humanity in the short- and long-term have increased the relevance of adjusting existing models of monetary relations to address accumulated imbalances and contradictions, including those in the social security system, whose role has grown significantly over the past century. This study examines the financial-investment model of social security (FIMSS), its design and parameters, as well as its features and role in managing social risks and ensuring social protection for the population.
The purpose of the article is to refine methodological approaches to designing the FIMS framework, classifying its parameters, and identifying opportunities for improving the sustainability and efficiency of social security systems.
Objectives: to systematize the factors influencing the formation of the FIMSO; to develop a classification of the parametric features of the FIMSO according to significant aspects of the social security system; to assess the possibilities of adapting the FIMSO to modern socio-economic challenges.
Methodology. The study employs fundamental scientific methods such as analysis and synthesis of essential country-specific factors (demographic, economic, financial, cultural, and technological), as well as the classification of FIMSS parameters based on empirical data, regulatory documents, and scientific research.
Results. Based on ILO data for OECD countries, Russia, and China, a detailed classification of exogenous and endogenous factors influencing the choice of FIMSS design has been developed. Additionally, a classification of the parametric features of FIMS across 15 criteria has been proposed, enabling financial modeling in the social security system and the selection of the most suitable FIMSS design considering country-specific characteristics.
Conclusions. Effective FIMSS management requires consideration of comprehensive country-specific factors, the integration of digital technologies, and a balance between public and private participation. The proposed approaches contribute to enhancing the universality, targeting, and financial sustainability of social security systems. The work presented can be useful for conducting financial modeling of social security systems and selecting the optimal design considering specific country characteristics and the operating environment of FIMSS.

1. Dorofeev M.L. The evolution of financial-investment models of social security under modern global challenges. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics. Taxes. Law. 2024;17(2):60–70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2024-17-2-60-70

2. World Social Protection Report 2014/15: Building Economic Recovery, Inclusive Development and Social Sustice. International Labour Organization. Available at: https://www.socialprotection.org/gimi/ShowWiki.action?id=3426 (accessed 29.11.2024).

3. De-facto gaps in social protection for standard and non-standard workers: An approach for monitoring the accessibility and levels of income support. OECD. Available at: https:// www.oecd.org/en/publications/de-facto-gaps-in-social-protection-for-standard-and-nonstandard-workers_48e282e7-en.html (accessed 29.11.2024).

4. Makashina O.V., Krasnikova N.S. Methodological approaches to financing government expenditures on social protection of the population. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Seriya: Ekonomika, finansy i upravlenie proizvodstvom = Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Series: Economics, Finance, and Production Management. 2021;(4):33–41. (In Russ.) https:// doi.org/10.6060/ivecofin.2021504.565

5. Recommendation concerning national floors of social protection. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---normes/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_r202_ru.pdf (accessed 29.11.2024).

6. World Social Protection Report 2024–26: Universal social protection for climate action and a just transition. International Labour Conference. Available at: https://www.socialprotection.org/gimi/Media.action?id=10982 (accessed 10.11.2024).

7. Sedova M.L. The future of the funded component of the Russian pension system. RISK: Resursy, Informatsiya, Snabzhenie, Konkurentsiya = RISK: Resources, Information, Supply, Competition. 2021;(4):128–135. (In Russ.)

8. Global Report 2022. Priorities for social security. Trends, challenges, and solutions. ISSA. Available at: https://ww1.issa.int/sites/default/files/documents/2022-10/2-PrioritiesGlobal.pdf (accessed 20.11.2024).

9. OECD.Stat. Social Expenditure ‒ Aggregated data. Available at: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SOCX_AGG (accessed 08.11.2024).

10. Im T., Cho W., Porumbescu G. An empirical analysis of the relation between social spending and economic growth in developing countries and OECD members. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration. 2011;33(1):37–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2011.10779377

11. Govdeli T., Umar E.K. Dynamic links between social spending and economic growth: the most important conclusions for Central European countries. Comparative Economic Research. 2021;24(4):7. (In Polish) https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.24.28

12. Cammeraat E. The relationship between different social expenditure schemes and poverty, inequality, and economic growth. International Social Security Review. 2020;73(2):101–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12236

13. Beraldo S., Montolio D., Turati G. Healthy, educated, and wealthy: A primer on the impact of public and private welfare expenditures on economic growth. The Journal of SocioEconomics. 2009;38(6):946–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.06.013

14. Afonso A., Alegre J.G. Economic growth and budgetary components: a panel assessment for the EU. Empirical Economics. 2011;41:703-723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-010-0400-9

15. Shaista A. Social sector expenditures and economic growth: A Review. Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics. 2015;25(1):105-111.

16. Lindert P.H. Growing public. Vol. 1. Davis: Cambridge University Press; 2004. 396 p.

17. Alper F.O., et al. Public social expenditures and economic growth: Evidence from selected OECD countries. Research in World Economy. 2016;7(2):44-51. http://doi.org/10.5430/rwe.v7n2p44

18. Atkinson A.B. Is the welfare state necessarily an obstacle to economic growth? European Economic Review. 1995;39(3-4):723-730. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(94)00079-F

19. Carter J., Craigwell R., Lowe S. Government expenditure and economic growth in a small open economy: A disaggregated approach. Available at: https://docs.yandex.ru/docs/view?tm= 1739177759&tld=ru&lang=en&name=3_1-Carter_Craigwell_Lowe-p.pdf&text (accessed 17.11.2024).

20. Arjona R., Ladaique M., Pearson M. Growth, inequality and social protection. In: Policy Politiques. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2003. P. S119-S139. https://doi.org/10.2307/3552279

21. Zhang J., Zhang J. How does social security affect economic growth? Evidence from cross-country data. Journal of Population Economics. 2004;17:473-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-004-0198-x

22. Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1990. P. 9‒54.

23. Vrooman J.C. Regimes and cultures of social security: Comparing institutional models through nonlinear PCA. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. 2012;53(5-6):444-477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715212469512

24. Frumina S.V. On the discussion about the content of finance. Finansy = Finance. 2023;(6):45–49. (In Russ.)

25. Frumina S.V., Yakushova E.S., Azimzadeh A. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on insurance demand in Russia: A comparative analysis with global markets. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 2024;19(9):3289–3298.

26. Frumina S.V. Directions for expanding fiscal space: modern realities. Bankovskie uslugi = Banking Services. 2024;(8):2–9. (In Russ.)

27. Dorofeev M.L. Fiscal multipliers and the level of income inequality (on the example of OECD countries, Russia, and China). Voprosy Ekonomiki = Economic Issues. 2024;(4):111–126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-4-111-126