Mind and thought in the writings of René Descartes: the anthropological character of Cartesian metaphysics

Relevance. At the present stage of development of human knowledge phenomenon of the mind continues to represent one of the most priority and complex problems, standing in the centre of attention of representatives of an infinite number of fields of knowledge, directions of scientific, philosophical and religious-mystical thought. Scientific study and explanation.
In this context, according to the authors, a renewed look at Rene Descartes' ideas about the nature of the mind becomes more relevant. They are of interest both in connection with the threat of losing Descartes' authentic views behind educational and ideological schemes, and in connection with the anthropological intentions of Cartesian metaphysics.
The purpose is to conceptualise Rene Descartes' philosophical views on the nature of the mental as an anthropological project.
Objectives: to present Descartes' metaphysical project in general terms; to analyze the anthropological element in Descartes' metaphysics; to demonstrate how the anthropological fundamental element for Descartes' constructions is.
Methodology. A systematic approach allowed us to examine Descartes' constructions in the unity of their constituent parts; methods of analysis and synthesis enabled us both to isolate the anthropological component from Descartes' overall metaphysical picture, and to trace the specific relationship of this picture as a whole with this component; a hermeneutic approach was employed for the correct analysis and interpretation of Descartes' works and ideas.
Results. In this work, Descartes' metaphysical project was presented in general outline, its anthropological element was analyzed, and the meaning-forming significance of anthropological intentions for Cartesian metaphysics was substantiated.
Conclusions. The substantial distinction between body and mind occurs due to the inability of mechanistic models to account for the human mind. Descartes' views on the bodily-spiritual nature of man can be characterized as complex: if at the theoretical level we arrive at substantial dualism, then at the practical level we arrive at phenomenal monism. These two positions are accepted by Descartes as dialectically complementing each other and necessary for a complete understanding of the human being.

1. Volohova N.V. The problem of mind in the philosophy of L. N. Tolstoy. Izvestiya YugoZapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Menedzhment = Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics, Sociology and Management. 2017;7(2):203-212. (In Russ.)

2. Vizgin V. Cartesianism. Filosofskaya antropologiya = Philosophical Anthropology. 2020;6(1):139-162. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21146/2414-3715-2020-6-1-139-162

3. Rorty R. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1980. 401 p.

4. Ryle G. The Concept of Mind. Moscow: Ideya-Press, Dom intellektual'noj knigi; 1999. 408 p. (In Russ.)

5. Varhotov T.A. Cartesian anthropology as an epistemological framework of the contemporary philosophy of mind. In: Filosofiya soznaniya: klassika i sovremennost': Vtorye Gryaznovskie chteniya = Philosophy of mind: the classics and contemporary: The Second Gryaznov readings. Moscow: Izdatel' Savin S. N.; 2007. P. 30-40. (In Russ.)

6. Mukherji N. The Human Mind Through the Lens of Language: Generative Explorations. London: Bloomsbury Academic; 2022. 268 p.

7. Volohova N.V., Filippovich M.S. The experience of one's own knowledge through the prism of doubt and scepticism: a philosophical analysis. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Menedzhment = Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics, Sociology and Management. 2022;12(2):268-275. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2022-12-2-268-275

8. Dekart R. Principles of Philosophy. In: Writings. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl'; 1989. P. 297-422. (In Russ.)

9. Avgustin Avrelij. On the Trinity: in fifteen books against the Arians. Krasnodar: Glagol; 2004. 416 p. (In Russ.)

10. Dekart R. From the correspondence of 1643-1649. In: Writings. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl'; 1989. P. 489-588. (In Russ.)

11. Singer P. Animal Liberation: The Definitive Classic of the Animal Movement. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics; 2009. 484 p.

12. Goertzel B. Artificial General Intelligence: Concept, State of the Art, and Future Prospects. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence. 2014;5(1):1-48. https://doi.org/10.2478/jagi-2014-0001

13. Dekart R. Reasoning about a method to guide your mind correctly and find the truth in the sciences. In: Essays. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl'; 1989. P. 250-296. (In Russ.)

14. Wilson M. Descartes. London: Routledge; 2005. 231 p.

15. Raga-Rosaleny V. Passionate Descartes: A reinterpretation of the body's role in cartesian thought. Manuscrito. 2020;43:54-94. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2020.V43N2.VR

16. Koval' O.A. The anthropological significance of the passions in the rationalist metaphysics of René Descartes. Filosofiya i kul'tura = Philosophy and Culture. 2016;(2):198-205. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7256/1999-2793.2016.2.15006

17. Yaldır H. The Cartesian Man: The Hybrid Entity Emerging from an Intimate Unification of the Mind and Body. Kaygı: Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi. 2007;8:9-23.

18. Knyazeva E.N. The psychophysical problem in Descartes and his critics in the modern conception of embodied cognition. Metod: Moskovskij ezhegodnik trudov iz obshchestvovedcheskih disciplin = Method: Moscow Yearbook of Proceedings from Social Science Disciplines. 2020;(10):179-195. (In Russ.)

19. Kozyreva O.A. Substantial dualism and the privateness of the mental in the philosophy of R. Descartes: a critique of superficial interpretation. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Tomsk State University. 2020;(452):79-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/452/9

20. Dekart R. Meditations on First Philosophy, in which the existence of God and the immortality of the soul are demonstrated. In: Works. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl'; 1989. P. 3-72. (In Russ.)

21. Dekart R. Passions of the Soul. In: Works. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl'; 1989. P. 483-572. (In Russ.)