Preview

Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management

Advanced search

Management in Universities of Art and Culture: European Experience

Abstract

Relevance. One of the most discussed topics in the field by universities in Russia is the participation of the faculty. In European countries, the Humboldt model is historically implemented. It is based on a "strong professorship", an academic senate and a nominal rector of the Humboldt model of university management. Today, in most European countries, there are trends that are aimed at developing a system of external, including public control in order to improve the quality of educational services. The study of foreign experience will minimize mistakes in the development of an optimal domestic model for managing universities of culture and art.
Thus, the article examines and systematizes the experience of managing universities in the field of art and culture in European countries. Particular attention is paid to the participation in the development and management decision-making of all actors interested in the quality and effectiveness of educational and research activities: government agencies, teachers, potential employers, experts, students.
The purpose of the study is to systematize the European experience of managing universities of art and culture.
Objectives. To achieve this goal, the experience of Finland, Austria, Denmark and Germany as European leading countries in the provision of educational services for higher education of culture and art is studied and systematized.
Methodology. Research methods are comparative analysis and classification method. The materials for the study were open data from the official websites of the largest European universities, the requirements of national regulatory legal acts in the field of higher education and university management.
The results of the study made it possible not only to correlate the studied practices of managing universities in the field of culture with theoretical models, but also to determine the features of the functioning and powers of sole and collegial governing bodies, the specifics of the formation and activities of self-governing bodies of educational organizations in European countries.
Conclusion. In the process of optimizing the management system of domestic higher education institutions in the field of culture and art, it is advisable to take into account the best European practices and experience.

About the Authors

V. V. Matveev
Orel branch of Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Matveev, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor of the Department of Economics and Management

Researcher ID: K-1544-2014

Gostinaya st. 2, Orel 302001



S. V. Simonov
Orel branch of Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Sergey V. Simonov, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Economics and Management

Researcher ID: F-7207-2018

Gostinaya st. 2, Orel 302001



References

1. Evmenov A. D., Smirnov A. J. Ratsionalizatsiya mekhanizma upravleniya sferoi kul'tury [Rationalization of the mechanism of management in the sphere of culture]. St. Petersburg, Dialog Publ., 2006. 156 p.

2. Smirnov A. Yu. Sovershenstvovanie sistemy upravleniya sferoi kul'tury: teoreticheskii i metodologicheskii podkhody. Avtoref. diss. kand. ekon. nauk [Improvement of the management system in the sphere of culture: theoretical and methodological approaches. Abstract diss. cand. econ. sci.]. St. Petersburg, 2013. 36 p.

3. Suminova T. N. Art-menedzhment. Realizatsiya gosudarstvennoi politiki v sfere kul'tury i iskusstva [Art management. Implementation of state policy in the field of culture and art]. Moscow, Academic project Publ., 2017. 165 p.

4. Irkhen I. I. Rossiiskoe obrazovanie v sfere kul'tury i iskusstva: global'nye i regional'nye izmereniya. Avtoref. diss. dokt. kul'torologii [Russian education in the field of culture and art: global and regional dimensions. Abstract diss. dr. cultur.]. Moscow, 2012. 42 p.

5. Krotov V. V. Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskie mekhanizmy razvitiya professional'nogo obrazovaniya v sfere kul'tury. Avtoref. diss. kand. ekon. nauk [Organizational and economic mechanisms for the development of professional education in the field of culture. Abstract diss. cand. econ. sci]. Moscow, 2004. 22 p.

6. Kudrina E. L. Diversifikatsiya vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya v sfere kul'tury i iskusstva. Avtoref. diss. kand. ped. nauk [Diversification of higher professional education in the field of culture and art. Abstract diss. cand. ped. sci.]. Moscow, 1999. 44 p.

7. Stepnyak Yu. V. Upravlenie uchebno-obrazovatel'nymi strukturami v sfere kul'tury i iskusstva. Avtoref. diss. kand. ped. nauk [Management of educational and educational structures in the field of culture and art. Abstract diss. cand. ped. sci.]. Moscow, 2005. 56 p.

8. Stukalova O. V. Vysshee professional'noe obrazovanie v sfere kul'tury i iskusstva: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. Avtoref. diss. dokt. ped. nauk [Higher professional education in the field of culture and art: current state and development prospects. Abstract diss. dr. ped. sci.]. Moscow, 2011. 42 p.

9. Permyakova N. V. Organizatsionno-pedagogicheskie osnovy upravleniya obrazovatel'nymi uchrezhdeniyami v sovremennykh usloviyakh: na primere uchebnykh zavedenii sfery kul'tury i iskusstva Yamalo-Nenetskogo avtonomnogo okruga. Avtoref. diss. kand. ped. nauk [Organizational and pedagogical foundations of management of educational institutions in modern conditions: On the example of educational institutions in the sphere of culture and art of the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug. Abstract diss. cand. ped. sci.]. Moscow, 2004. 19 p.

10. Klyuev A. K., Tomilin O. B., Fadeeva I. M., Tomilin O. O. Upravlenie universitetom: itogi transformatsii [University Management: Results of Transformation]. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis, 2018, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 93–104.

11. Goodall A. H. Should top universities be led by top researchers, and are they? Journal of Documentation, 2016, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 388–411.

12. Gosling J., Bolden R., Petrov G. Distributed leadership in higher education. What does it accomplish? Leadership, 2009, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 299–310.

13. Schulz G. Quality Management in Arts Universities. Positioning Higher Education Institutions: From here to there. Dordrecht, Sense Publ., 2018. pp. 85–97.

14. Uchastie v upravlenii universitetom [Participation in the management of the university]; ed. by O. V. Bychkova. St. Petersburg, Norma Publ., 2016. 120 p.

15. Bundesrecht konsolidiert: Gesamte Rechtsvorschrift für Universitätsgesetz 2002. Available at: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20002128. (accessed 10.01.2021)

16. University of Art and Industrial Design in Linz. Available at: https://www.ufg.ac.at/?id=1249. (accessed 10.01.2021)

17. Vienna University of Arts. Available at: https://www.dieangewandte.at/universitaet/organisation/universitaetsrat. (accessed 10.01.2021)

18. Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts. Available at: https://www.kunstakademiet.dk. (accessed 10.01.2021)

19. Helsinki University of the Arts. Available at: https://www.uniarts.fi/en/units/universitymanagement/. (accessed 10.01.2021)

20. Berlin University of the Arts. Available at: https://www.udk-berlin.de/universitaet/universitaetsleitung/#c9237/. (accessed 10.01.2021)


Review

For citations:


Matveev V.V., Simonov S.V. Management in Universities of Art and Culture: European Experience. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2021;11(2):22-33. (In Russ.)

Views: 96


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-1552 (Print)