Assessing the effects of potential introduction of an export duty on wheat in Kazakhstan

Relevance. Potential restrictions on wheat exports, risks of disruptions to its transportation, and increased market uncertainty highlight the need to assess regulatory measures for Kazakhstan’s wheat market.
The purpose is to find out the impact of the potential introduction of an export duty on the wheat market in Kazakhstan.
Objectives: to assess the consequences of wheat export regulation methods; to verify the feasibility of wheat export restrictions, considering availability indices and grain self-sufficiency indices in Kazakhstan.
Methodology. The paper uses the method of analyzing stakeholders who benefited or suffered from the introduction of an export duty on wheat in Kazakhstan. The paper uses a model to estimate the effects of an export duty on wheat.
Results. Under the effect of the export duty, the surplus of producers in Kazakhstan will be reduced by $163.4 million. Part of these losses, equal to the total revenue from the duty, will be transferred to the state budget. (USD 141.9 million). Domestic wheat consumers will benefit from increased purchases and lower prices, and their surplus will increase by $5.4 million. The net result of the Republic of Kazakhstan from the introduction of export duties is losses in the amount of 57.8 million US dollars.
Conclusions. Wheat exports in Kazakhstan should not be restricted. The republic has sufficient wheat supplies, with a low risk of shortages, as evidenced by high stocks-to-use ratios. Export duties on wheat are a counterproductive measure that could reduce the investment attractiveness of the sub-sector. Export duties carry the risk of losing hard-won foreign markets if reduced supplies from Kazakhstan’s exporters are replaced by products from competing countries. It is important not to hinder the increase in wheat production so that there is enough for both growing domestic demand and exports.

1. Ermek G. The Ministry of Agriculture of Kazakhstan considers it inappropriate to introduce export duties on wheat and barley. AgroInfo. (In Russ.) Available at: https://agroinfo.kz/msx-kazaxstana-schitaet-necelesoobraznym-vvedenie-eksportnyx-poshlin-na-pshenicu-iyachmen/(accessed 20.03.2025).

2. Kiselev S., Seitov S. Regulating the Russian Wheat Export Trade during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Food Security in Eurasia 2020: Case Studies. Мoscow: Eurasian Center for Food Security; 2021. P. 83–102.

3. Imamverdiyev N., Anders S., Glauben T., Perekhozhuk O., Prehn S. Determinants of Trade Duration of Kazakhstan’s Wheat Exports. In: 29th International Conference of Agricultural Economists: Agriculture in an interconnected world. Milan, Italy; 2015. 21 p.

4. Genkin A.S., Mikheev A.A. Influence of coronavirus crisis on food industry economy. Foods and Raw Materials. 2020;(8):204–215. http://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2020-2-204-215

5. Buyanov S. Restrictions on grain and flour exports cost Kazakhstan $150 million. Forbes. (In Russ.) Available at: https://forbes.kz/finances/markets/ogranicheniya_na_eksport_zerna_i_muki_oboshlis_kazahstanu_v_150_mln/ (accessed 20.03.2025).

6. Ternovsky D.S., Shagaida N.I. Agricultural sector during the pandemic. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii = Russian Economic Development. 2021;28(1):24–28. (In Russ.)

7. Shik O.V. Impact of state support on Russian agricultural producers and consumers. Voprosy ekonomiki = Economic Issues. 2023;(4):67-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-4-67-84

8. Kiselev S., Romashkin R. Export restrictions under the pandemic shock: implications for the competitiveness of wheat production in Russia. In: Agrarian Perspectives XXX. Sources of Competitiveness Under Pandemic and Environmental Shocks: Proceedings of the 30th International Scientific Conference. Prague: Czech University of Life Sciences; 2021. P. 129–139.

9. Oshakbayev R. Economics of Grain Exports in Kazakhstan. Prospects and Analysis of Wheat Exports. (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/CA1815RU/ca1815ru.pdf (accessed 20.03.2025).

10. Toleuov T.E., Kurmangaliev E.-D.T. Digital technologies to mitigate the effects of COVID-19. In: International Scientific Review of the Problems and Prospects of Modern Science and Education: LXXXI International Correspondence Scientific and Practical Conference. Boston: Problems of science; 2021. P. 8-13. (In Russ.)

11. Belugina T.A., Belugin A.Yu. The use of integral indicators for the assessment of food security of Russia in modern conditions. Pishchevaya promyshlennost' = Food Industry. 2017;(12):62-65. (In Russ.)

12. Belugin A.Yu. Assessment of Russia's Food Self-Sufficiency in the Context of Foreign Trade Restrictions. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya = Theory and Practice of Social Development. 2022;(12):121–126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2022.12.18

13. OECD’s Producer Support Estimate and related indicators of agricultural support. Concepts, Calculations, Interpretation and Use (The PSE Manual). OECD. Trade and Agriculture Directorate. Available at: https://oeclass.aua.gr/eclass/modules/document/file.php/AOA189/ΣΗΜΕΙΩΣΕΙΣ/OECD_PSE%20MANUAL.pdf (accessed 18.03.2025).

14. Review of the socio-economic situation and foreign economic activity of the Republic of Kazakhstan by the end of 2023. Trade Representative Office of the Russian Federation in the Republic of Kazakhstan. (In Russ.) Available at: https://минэко04.рф/upload/site/AttachmentReview% 20CES%20i%20VED%20Kazakhstan%20za%202023%20g..pdf (accessed 18.03.2025).

15. Kazakhstan: Why there is a shortage of grain wagons and how to increase the competitiveness of Kazakhstani grain. ZERNO.RU. (In Russ.) Available at: https://zerno.ru/node/21563 (accessed 20.03.2025).

16. Masaleva A. There is grain ‒ there are no wagons. Time. 2022. 18 November. (In Russ.) Available at: https://time.kz/articles/nu/2022/11/18/zerno-est-vagonov-net (accessed 18.03.2025).