Digital technologies for monitoring food quality
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2025-15-3-87-101
Abstract
Relevance. Food quality is a pledge of society’s health and longevity, as it most directly affects the physiological potential of humanity and its future generations. Poor product quality not only leads to falling sales in the future, but also damages business reputation and financial well-being in the long run. The state has already actively engaged in the process of quality control of products, but there remain challenges for businesses to upgrade and adapt their own production to innovative standards.
Purpose. The main objective of this study was the need to study and control the quality of food production in the context of the emergence of a data economy.
Objectives. The article sets and consistently solves the following tasks: to evaluate the system of state monitoring of control of public and organized catering of the population of different age and social groups, to identify the main problems of declining quality of food production in the industrial sector, to determine the importance of innovative digital technologies for labeling and quality control of food products; to develop recommendations for improving the digital monitoring system.
Methodology. The work used general scientific methods of generalization, analysis of information resources, systematization, analogy and comparison.
Results. High-quality nutrition of the population is impossible without the production of sufficient and balanced quantities of food products in accordance with physiological norms of human consumption. Reducing the turnover of counterfeit products on the food market and increasing the responsibility of producers and sellers is possible under the conditions of using digital tracking methods.
Conclusions. Nutrition of the population acts as an important direction of balanced development of labor resources, so the problem of low-quality food products found reflection in the emergence of digital monitoring methods of product turnover traceability. The development and implementation of digital product traceability tools will not only bring credibility to product turnover, but also enhance the accountability of manufacturers and suppliers of a given product to end users.
About the Authors
G. V. FedotovaRussian Federation
Gilian V. Fedotova, Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Leading Resea; Professor of the Department of Economics and Digital Technologies in the Agroindustrial
Complex
44/2 Vavilova Str., Moscow 119333
23 Academician Skryabina Str., Moscow 109472
Yu. A. Kapustina
Russian Federation
Yulia A. Kapustina, Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Director of the Socio-Economic Institute
37 Sibirskiy Trakt Str., Yekaterinburg 620100
I. S. Larionova
Russian Federation
Irina S. Larionova, Doctor of Sciences (Philosophy), Professor, Head of the Department
of Philosophy and Social and Humanitarian Sciences
23 Academician Skryabina Str., Moscow 109472
References
1. Matison V.A., Arutyunova N.I. Food quality. Pishchevaya promyshlennost' = Food Industry. 2016;(4):50-54. (In Russ.)
2. Critical E.P. The current state of the industry of breeding and seed production in Russia: key problems and directions of their solution. Melioratsiya i gidrotekhnika = Land Reclamation and Hydraulic Engineering. 2021;11(4):245–265. (In Russ.)
3. Vorotnikov I.L., Murav'eva M.V., Petrov K.A. Information management of processes of regulation of dependence of Russian agriculture on imports of seeds and seed material. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Voronezh State Agrarian University. 2019;12(4):228-234. (In Russ.)
4. Volkova I.N. Genetic engineering, breeding and seed production as an innovative activity in the agrarian sector of Russia: problems and prospects of development. In: Innovatsii v territorial'nom razvitii: materialy XXXVI ezhegodnoi sessii ekonomiko-geograficheskoi sektsii Mezhdunarodnoi akademii regional'nogo razvitiya i sotrudnichestva = Innovations in territorial development: Materials of the XXXVI annual session of the economic and geographical section of the International Academy of Regional Development and Cooperation. Moscow: Izd-vo IP Matushkina I. I.; 2020. P. 87–97. (In Russ.)
5. Kalinin A.M., Samokhvalov V.A. Effectiveness of financial support to agriculture: general assessment and inter-budget effect. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2020;31:565–572.
6. Ergashev B.A., Shadiev Z.I. Food safety is one of the most pressing challenges facing countries around the world. Universum: tekhnicheskie nauki = Universum: Technical Sciences. 2024;(2):8-9. (In Russ.)
7. Ergashev B.A., Shadiev Z.I. The role of digital solutions in monitoring and quality control of food products at all stages of the supply chain. Universum: tekhnicheskie nauki = Universum: Technical Sciences. 2025;(3):30-32. (In Russ.)
8. Dmitriev A.V. Digital technologies for cargo traceability in transport and logistics systems. Strategicheskie resheniya i risk-menedzhment = Strategic Decisions and Risk Management. 2019;10(1):20–26. (In Russ.)
9. Glebova E.V. Regulatory support for traceability at food enterprises. In: Nauchnaya transformatsiya – osnova ustoichivogo innovatsionnogo razvitiya obshchestva: sbornik statei Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (g. Kazan', RF, 12 maya 2023 g.) = Scientific transformation is the basis for sustainable innovative development of society: Collection of articles from the International scientific and practical conference, 12 May 2023, Kazan. Ufa: Omega science; 2023. P. 72-77. (In Russ.)
10. Vorotyntseva T.M., Tultseva A.S. Traceability of goods as a mechanism for regulating international trade. Marketing i logistika = Marketing and Logistics. 2018;(5):22–31. (In Russ.)
11. Rozhdestvenskaya L.N., Lipatova L.P. Improving the quality of food products based on traceability. Pishchevaya promyshlennost' = Food Industry. 2017;(11):64–68. (In Russ.)
12. Belyatskaya T.N., Feshchenko S.L. Digital traceability: concept and directions of development. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SPbGPU. Ekonomicheskie nauki = Scientific and Technical Statements of St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University. Economic Sciences. 2021;14(4):7–19. (In Russ.)
13. Zyukin D. A. Support for the development of breeding and seed production in Russia as an element of the formation of an innovative agrarian economy. Vestnik Kurskoi gosudarstvennoi sel'skokhozyaistvennoi akademii = Bulletin of the Kursk State Agricultural Academy. 2019;(9):173–180. (In Russ.)
14. Farag H., Korenkiewicz D., Riedl J. Transportation and Logistics in a Changing World. BCG. Available at: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2016/corporate-development-financevalue-creation-strategy-transportation-and-logistics-in-a-changing-world (accessed 11.03.2025).
15. Kovalenko E.G. Monitoring the turnover of goods as a special form of state control. Vestnik Khabarovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava = Bulletin of the Khabarovsk State University of Economics and Law. 2021;(1):108–113. (In Russ.)
16. Feshchenko S.L. Traceability and labeling systems as a factor in increasing the reliability of supply chains. In: Materialy XVII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii Akademii upravleniya pri Prezidente Respubliki Belarus' = Proceedings of the XVII International Scientific and Practical Conference of the Academy of Management under the President of the Republic of Belarus. Minsk; 2021. P. 386–388. (In Russ.)
17. Laptev R.A., Kovarda V.V., Rogov R.A. Main directions of development of the goods traceability system as a factor in ensuring Russia's security in the context of expanding globalization. Vestnik Evraziiskoi nauki = Bulletin of Eurasian Science. 2020;12(1):1‒14. (In Russ.)
18. Simachev Yu.V., Kuzyk M.G. Interaction of Russian business with science: touchpoints and stumbling blocks. Voprosy ekonomiki = Questions of Economy. 2020;(6):103–138. (In Russ.)
19. Zaharia T., Moga L.M., Nenciu M.I., Maximov V., Tiganov G. Adoption of traceability systems by romanian fishery and aquaculture influencing factors and benefits. Quality – Access To Success. 2015;16(148):80–82.
20. Senneset G., Forås E., Fremme K.M. Challenges regarding im-plementation of electronic chain traceability. British Food Journal. 2009;(109):805–818. https://doi.org/10.1108/00-070700710821340
Review
For citations:
Fedotova G.V., Kapustina Yu.A., Larionova I.S. Digital technologies for monitoring food quality. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2025;15(3):87-101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2025-15-3-87-101