Civic Activity in the Region’s Socio-Network Space
Abstract
The relevance of this study is determined by the need for scientific understanding of the transformation of civic activity, taking into account the development of the socio- network space of public communications.
The purpose of this publication is to determine the level of civic activity of the region's population in the socionetwork space.
Objectives: to determine the level of civic activity of the population and degree of its manifestation in social media; to identify the role of the state in creating conditions for the implementation of civic activity in the socionetwork space of public communications.
The methodology of this research is based on the concepts of public value management and network management of public management, which focus on the formation of a socio-network space of public communications. It is within the framework of such a space that it is possible to establish a dialogue and establish a partnership between citizens and authorities in solving socially significant regional problems. Analysis of civic activity of the region’s population, the influence of socio-network public communications and activities of the authorities, was based on mass data of sociological surveys conducted by the authors in 2020.
The results of this study allow us to record the growing role of social media as interactive platforms that serve as an environment for citizens to engage in the discussion of socially important issues and participate in the implementation of decisions. The configuring of the socio-network space creates new forms and opportunities for the manifestation of social activity of the population on specialized sites. Despite the significant potential of such a configuration of the socio-network space of public communications in solving socially significant problems, it should be noted that the results of the conducted surveys allow us to record a still low level of civic activity of Kursk region residents. On the one hand, this indicates a lack of information and educational work on the part of the authorities. On the other hand, the population shows its readiness to be involved in the discussion and solution of socially significant issues, using the dialogical possibilities of social media.
The authors come to the conclusion that civic activity in the socio-network space has distinctive features that make its use in solving socially significant problems of the region more promising.
About the Authors
V. V. ZotovRussian Federation
Vitaly V. Zotov, Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Professor, Professor at the Department of Philosophy, Educational and Scientific Center for the Humanities and Social Sciences
Researcher ID: E-6506-2014
9 Institutsky Per., Dolgoprudny Moscow region 141701
E. I. Boev
Russian Federation
Evgeny I. Boev, Candidate of Sociological Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Public Administration and
Law
Researcher ID: O-9863-2015
9 Stancionnaya str., Kursk 305044
L. A. Vasilenko
Russian Federation
Liudmila A. Vasilenko, Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Professor
82 Vernadskogo prosp., Moscow 119606
References
1. Plyays Ya. A. Politologiya v kontekste perekhodnoy ekonomiki Rossii [Political Science in the Context of Russia's Transition Economy]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2009. 448 p.
2. Volkova N. V., Giseva L. A. Grazhdanskaya aktivnost’ kak zerkalo politicheskikh, dukhovnykh I kul’turnykh tsennostey obschestva [Civic activity as a Mirror of the Political, Spiritual, and Cultural values of Society]. Sovremennye problem nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2013, no. 5, pp. 701-705.
3. Sedova N. N. Grazhdanskiy aktivizm v sovremennoy Rossii: formaty, faktory, sotsial’naya baza [Civic Activism In Modern Russia: Forms, Factors, And Social Base]. Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal = Sociological Journal, 2014, no. 2, pp. 48-71.
4. Burenko V. I., Bronnikov I. A. Elektronnoe grazhdanskoe obschestvo: illyuzii ili real’nost’ (Zarubezhny opyt i otechestvennaya praktika. Politicheskiy aspect) [Electronic civil society: illusions or reality? (Foreign experience and russian practice. The political aspect)]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie = Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 2012, no. 1, pp. 44-51.
5. Volkova A. V. Mekhanizmy i metody vnedreniya menedzhmenta publichnykh tsennostey: rossiyskie i zarubezhnye praktiki [Mechanisms And Methods Of Public Values Management Implementation: Russian And Foreign Practices]. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kulturologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki = Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice, 2013, no. 12-3(38), pp. 43-47.
6. Rhodes R. A. W. The New Governance: Governing Without Government. Political Studies, 1996, no. 1, pp. 9-26.
7. Smorgunov L. V. Upravlyaemost’ i setevoe politicheskoe upravlenie [Manageability And Network Political Management]. Vlast’ = Power, 2014, no. 6, pp. 5-14.
8. Sistema monitoringa sotsial’nykh media Brand Analytics [Monitoring System of social media Brand Analytics]. Available at: https://br-analytics.ru/statistics. (accessed 01.01.2021)
9. Vasilenko L. A., Zotov V. V., Zakharova S. A. Ispol’zovanie potentsiala sotsial’nykh media v stanovlenii uchastvuyuschego upravleniya [Social media potential for developing participatory governance]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov = Rudn Journal of Sociology, 2020, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 864-876.
10. Zotov V. V., Gubanov A. V. Formirovanie prostranstva publichnykh kommunikatsii sub’ekta RF v usloviyakh prevalirovaniya sotsial`nykh media [Creating a public communication space of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation in terms of social media prevalence]. Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika = Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics, 2019, no. 3 (59), pp. 57–61.
11. Mediascope [Mediascope]. Available at: https://webindex.mediascope.net/top-resources. (accessed 02.01.2021)
12. Press-vypusk "Istochniki informatsii" [Press release "Sources of information"]. Available at: https://www.levada.ru/2020/09/28/ggh/. (accessed 02.01.2021)
13. Babintsev V. P., Nadutkina I. E., Sapryka V.A. Expertnoe soobshchestvo kak sub"ekt grazhdanskogo uchastiya v regione [Expert community as a subject of civil participation in the region]. Vlast’ = Power, 2014, no. 7, pp. 5-9.
14. Tsifrovye portrety glav rossiyskikh regionov [Digital portraits of the heads of Russian regions]. Available at: https://cpkr.ru/issledovaniya/tsifrovye-portrety-glav-rossiyskikh-regionov/gubernatorygeroi-sotssetey-vypusk-za-noyabr-2020/. (accessed 01.12.2020)
15. Tsifrovye portrety glav rossiyskikh regionov [Digital portraits of the heads of Russian regions]. Available at: https://cpkr.ru/issledovaniya/tsifrovye-portrety-glav-rossiyskikh-regionov/gubernatorygeroi-sotssetey-vypusk-za-yanvar-2021/. (accessed 01.12.2020)
16. Frolov A. A., Palagicheva A. V. Rol' gosudarstva v upravlenii grazhdanskoi aktivnost'yu (po rezul'tatam issledovaniya, provedennogo v Yaroslavskoi oblasti) [The role of the state in the management of civic activity (the results of the study in the Yaroslavl region)]. Social'nye i gumanitarnye znanija = Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, 2017, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 149–154.
Review
For citations:
Zotov V.V., Boev E.I., Vasilenko L.A. Civic Activity in the Region’s Socio-Network Space. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2021;11(2):203-216. (In Russ.)