Preview

Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management

Advanced search

Sociocultural methodology of migration research in the EAEU countries: opportunities and prospects

https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2026-16-2-172-182

Abstract

Relevance. Centuries-old interconnections and integration intentions shape migration strategies that unfold against the backdrop of global turbulence, unpredictability, and the transformation of everyday cultural practices of interaction. In this context, sociocultural factors play a crucial role in Eurasian integration, as they become the defining factors in constructing a strategy for sociological analysis of migration, understanding its patterns and mechanisms. Sociocultural methodology provides a sufficient arsenal of methods and technologies for comprehensive, systematic research of migration processes in the EAEU. It provides an opportunity to present social and other programs for overcoming contradictions and conflicts in all aspects of interaction in the most accurate way possible, as well as to identify sustainable cultural forms of identification, adaptation, and integration of migrants into the host community. The purpose of this study is to characterize the development and evolution of the sociocultural approach as a methodology for migration research in the EAEU countries.
Objective: to present the historical and modern scientific context of the interdependence between migration and socioculture; to assess the possibilities and prospects of using the sociocultural methodology in the EAEU space.
Methodology. The scientific search is based on the principles and methods of the systemic approach, whose imperatives consider society as a unity of culture and sociality.
Results. The article presents a description of classical and neoclassical approaches to studying migration processes in the sociocultural perspective of foreign and Russian science.
Conclusions. The sociocultural approach to migration research in the EAEU space allows for the integration of the interdisciplinary potential of philosophy, sociology, cultural studies, psychology, economics, geography, and demography, and the closure of the methodological framework into a single scientific field. This approach enables the identification of optimal solutions for creating a space of understanding, interaction, and cooperation.

About the Author

A. P. Abramov
Institute of Social Demography of the Federal Research Sociological Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Alexander P. Abramov, Doctor of Sciences (Sociological), Associate Professor, Chief Researcher

6/1 Fotieva Str., Moscow 119333



References

1. Davydov Yu.N., Goffman A.B., Kovalev A.D., et al. Essays on the history of theoretical sociology of the twentieth century (from M. Weber to J. Habermas, from G. Simmel to postmodernism). Moscow: Nauka; 1994. 380 p. (In Russ.)

2. Thomas W., Znaniecki F. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1927. 2232 p.

3. Park R., Burgess E., McKenzie R. The City. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1925. 239 p.

4. Kingsley D. Human Society. New York: Macmillan; 1949. 655 p.

5. Massey D.B. Spatial Divisions of Labor: Social Structures and the Geography of Production. New York: Methuen; 1984. 393 p.

6. Duncan H. Communication and Social Order. New York: Bedminster Press; 1962. 532 p.

7. Akhiezer A.S. Russia: Critique of historical experience (sociocultural dynamics of Russia). Vol. 1. Novosibirsk: Sibirsky Khronograf; 1998. 804 p. (In Russ.)

8. Zaslavskaya T.I. Migration of Rural Population. Moscow: Mysl; 1970. 312 p. (In Russ.)

9. Rybakovsky L.L. Factors and causes of population migration, the mechanism of their interrelationships. Narodonaseleniye = Population. 2017;(2):51–61. (In Russ.)

10. Osadchaya G.I. Social base of integration processes in the eurasian economic union. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya = Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Sociology. 2019;19(4):639–650. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313- 2272-2019-19-4-639-650.

11. Shteinman M.A. Migration in the 21st century: sociocultural challenges and social cooperation. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya. Zarubezhnoye regionovedeniye. Vostokovedeniye = Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series Political Science. History. International Relations. Foreign Regional Studies. Oriental Studies. 2017;(1):123–128. (In Russ.)

12. Tsapenko I.P. Search for new approaches to the sociocultural integration of migrants. Demograficheskoye obozreniye = Demographic Review. 2019;(5):125–149. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v5i4.8665.

13. Vertovec S. Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2007;30(6):1024-1054.

14. Berry John W. Human Ecology and Cognitive Style: Comparative Studies in Cultural and Psychological Adaptation. New York: Sage Publications; 1976. 242 р.

15. Alba R., Nee V. Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 2003. 359 p.

16. Gordon M.M. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press; 1964. 288 p.

17. Porter J. The Vertical Mosaic: An Analysis of Social Class and Power in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1965. 626 p.

18. Lewis R.D. Clash of Cultures: A Guide for Anyone Doing Business Abroad. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber; 2013. 635 p. (In Russ.)

19. Moghaddam F.M. The Omnicultural Imperative. Culture and Psychology. 2012;(18):304–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X12446230.

20. Prashad V. Bruce Lee and the anti-imperialism of Kung Fu: A polycultural adventure. Positions. 2003;11(1):51–89.

21. Kelley R.D.G. The people in me. Utne Reader. 1999;(95):79–81.

22. Tsapenko I.P. Intercultural paradigm of migrant integration. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk = Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2017;(87):915–926. (In Russ.)

23. Fedorova I.O. Conceptual development of migration theory: assimilation, transnationalism. Sotsiologiya i pravo = Sociology and Law. 2019;(4):46-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2019-4-46-51.

24. Grigg D.B. E.G. Ravenstein and the «laws of migration». Journal of Historical Geography. 1977;(3):41−54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-7488(77)90143-8.

25. Khot Z.Z., Chistyakova O.A. Possibilities of a sociocultural approach to the study of migration processes. Vestnik Adygeiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Regionovedenie: Filosofiya, istoriya, sotsiologiya, yurisprudentsiya, politologiya, kul'turologiya = Bulletin of Adyghe State University. Series: Regional Studies: Philosophy, History, Sociology, Jurisprudence, Political Science, Cultural Studies. 2017;2(199):139–146. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Abramov A.P. Sociocultural methodology of migration research in the EAEU countries: opportunities and prospects. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2026;16(2):172-182. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2026-16-2-172-182

Views: 62

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-1552 (Print)