Social Roles of Artificial Intelligence. Part 1. Ethics of Human-Machine Interaction in Personal and Public Spheres

   The relevance. The creation of machines with elements of intelligence is associated with the rapid development of science and technology, penetrating in recent decades into increasingly complex social spheres. Accordingly, it is necessary to build a proactive critical approach based on the analysis of the opportunities and threats of deep implementation of artificial systems with intelligence in social institutions – the structure of society.
   The purpose of the article is to analyze the positive and negative effects of the incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into social institutions "family" and "state".
   Objectives: to clarify the concept of "social institution" in the context of the new digital reality; to show the possibilities and risks of AI penetration into the sphere of personal and family relations; to consider the prospects and threats of AI inclusion in the economy and state policy.
   Methodology. In order to achieve the tasks set, the article uses an interdisciplinary approach that allows to support the philosophical analysis with the reflections of the roboticists and programmers themselves, the results of sociological research and statistical data posted in the public domain.
   Results. In the course of the study, the concept of a social institution is clarified, on the basis of which further arguments about the transformation of the social sphere under the influence of new technologies are based. It is assumed that within the framework of the proposed topic, changes in basic social institutions will be considered in two parts: the family, the state, the church, education, science and law. In this article we are talking about the sphere of personal, family and state relations, which, according to the author, are experiencing the most cardinal and destructive impact through the expansion of technologies with elements of artificial intelligence.
   Conclusions. Too rapid and thoughtless introduction of AIS into the social sphere can significantly transform social relations, up to the dysfunction of traditional social institutions and the destruction of human identity.

1. Karpov V. E., Gotovcev P. M., Rojzenzon G. V. K voprosu ob etike i sistemah iskusstvennogo intellekta [On the question of ethics and artificial intelligence systems]. Filosofiya i obshchestvo = Philosophy and Society, 2018, no. 2, pp. 84–105.

2. Fajngol'd M. L., Kuznecov D. V. Problemy iskusstvennogo intellekta [Problems of artificial intelligence]. Vladimir, Izdatel'stvo VGPU Publ., 2001. 47 p.

3. Poltavskaya E. I. O ponyatii "social'nyj institut" [On the concept of "social institute"]. SOCIS = SOCIS, 2009, no. 3, pp. 68-71.

4. Sedov L. A. Institut social'nyj [Social Institute]. Sovremennaya zapadnaya sociologiya [Modern Western Sociology]; ed. by Yu. N. Davydov, M. S. Kovaleva, A. F. Filippov. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1990. 432 p.

5. Signam A. Well connected? The biological implications of ‘social networking’. Biologist, 2009, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 14-20.

6. Nyholm S., Smids J. Can a robot be a good colleague? Science and Engineering Ethics, 2020, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2169–2188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00172-6

7. Elektronnaya zhena: zachem yaponec zhenilsya na gologramme [Electronic wife: why a Japanese man married a hologram]. Available at: https://style.rbc.ru/repost/5c277caf9a79474eeee6e078. (accessed 18.06.2022)

8. Latur B. Peresborka social'nogo: vvedenie v aktorno-setevuyu teoriyu [The reassembly of the social: an introduction to actor-network theory]; ed. by S. Gavrilenko. Moscow, Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2014. 384 p.

9. Budanov V. G. Novyj cifrovoj zhiznennyj tekhnouklad – perspektivy i riski transformacij antroposfery [New digital life technoclass – prospects and risks of transformations of the anthroposphere]. Filosofiya iskusstvennogo mira = Philosophy of the Artificial World, 2016, no. 6, pp. 47-55.

10. Budanov V. G., Aseeva I. A. [Umvelt-analysis and road maps of the Great anthropological transition]. Globalistika-2017. Materialy Mezhdunarodnogo nauchnogo kongressa [Globalistics-2017. Mate rials of the International Scientific Congress]. Moscow, FGP of global processes of Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2017. Available at: https://lomonosov-msu.ru/archive/Globalistics_2017/data/ section_6_10143.htm. (accessed 17.06.2022) (In Russ.)

11. Android Toshiba i Zloveshchaya Dolina [Android Toshiba and the Sinister Valley]. Available at: http://roboting.ru/1912-android-toshiba-i-zloveschaya-dolina.html. (accessed 28.06.2022)

12. But A. N., Bzhel'nikov E. V. Eticheskie i social'nye problemy vnedreniya iskusstvennogo intellekta: vzglyad programmista [Ethical and social problems of the introduction of artificial intelligence: a programmer's view]. Available at: https://scienceforum.ru/2018/article/2018007055. (accessed 28.06.2022)

13. Vladimirova T. V. O roli iskusstvennogo intellekta v stanovlenii novogo cifrovogo poryadka [On the role of artificial intelligence in the formation of a new digital order]. Informacionnoe obshchestvo = Information Society, 2022, no. 2, pp. 5-12.

14. Nacional'naya strategiya razvitiya iskusstvennogo intellekta do 2030 goda [National strategy for the development of artificial intelligence until 2030]. Available at: http://static.kremlin.ru/media/events/files/ru/AH4x6HgKWANwVtMOfPDhcbRpvd1HCCsv.pdf. (accessed 28.06.2022)

15. A new way to work. What will businesses look like tomorrow? Available at: https://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21724976-two-experts-mit-analyse-business-implications-ourdigital-future-what-will. (accessed 28.06.2022)

16. Dawson R. What is the Future of Work? Evans E., Burritt R., Guthrie J., eds. Future Proofing the Profession: Preparing Business Leaders and Finance Professionals for 2025. Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand/RMIT University, 2015, vol. 6, pp. 25–33.

17. Buritt R., Christ K. Industry 4.0 and environmental accounting: a new revolution? Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 2016, vol. 1, pp. 23-38.

18. Budanov V., Aseeva I., Zvonova E. Industry 4.0.: socio-economic junctures. Economic AnnalsXXI, 2017, vol. 168(11-12), pp. 33-37. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V168-07

19. Guthrie J., Evans E., Burritt R. Work: Past, Present and Future. Evans E., Burritt R., Guthrie J., eds. Future Proofing the Profession: Preparing Business Leaders and Finance Professionals for 2025. Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand/RMIT University, 2015, vol. 6, pp. 9–22.

20. Cifrovaya karma: kak budet rabotat' sistema social'nogo kredita v Kitae [Digital karma: how the social credit system will work in China]. Available at: https://trends.rbc.ru/trends/social/60e5ca569a7947a00440ba11. (accessed 28.06.2022)

21. Kryukova M. V. Social'nyj institut kak bazovyj komponent institucional'noj struktury obshchestva [Social institute as a basic component of the institutional structure of society]. Sistema cennostej sovremennogo obshchestva = The Value System of Modern Society, 2011, no. 18, pp. 221-225.